I'll see what I can do. :)
I'm using Maple's implementation of Puiseux series to debug my code. A while
ago my advisor wrote this implementation and has retained the rights to
distributing his code. However, Maple is a rather cryptic language to me so
at the moment I'm only checking output. :)
On a related subject: would it be a good idea to create a class for
function germs?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.
Hi,
I would like to see Puiseux series in Sage, implemented as an exact ring (in
particular over the algebraic closure QQbar).
I recommend you to examine the Puiseux series implementation in Magma as a
benchmark.
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co
Hello Marshall,
It would be great to have Puiseux series in Sage.
>
I agree!
> Hierarchically it seems it might make sense as a seperate module in
> rings/polynomial, just as laurent_series_ring.py. It seems a little
> categorically confusing (but perhaps convenient?) to add these as a
>
It would be great to have Puiseux series in Sage.
Hierarchically it seems it might make sense as a seperate module in
rings/polynomial, just as laurent_series_ring.py. It seems a little
categorically confusing (but perhaps convenient?) to add these as a
method to polynomials.
Are you reusing any
