I also found the "left over" files mult_table?.png and file?. This was
in the just released 5.0 . Did someone already open a ticket for this?
Le mardi 17 janvier 2012 22:49:28 UTC+1, John Cremona a écrit :
>
> On 17 January 2012 22:45, William Stein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After running (from
On 17 January 2012 22:45, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After running (from SAGE_ROOT) the test suite for this unofficial
> sage-5.0 release by doing "sage -t devel/sage/sage/" I found files
>
> mult_table0.png, ..., mult_table7.png
>
> left over in SAGE_ROOT.
>
Me too. There are also some f
Hi,
After running (from SAGE_ROOT) the test suite for this unofficial
sage-5.0 release by doing "sage -t devel/sage/sage/" I found files
mult_table0.png, ..., mult_table7.png
left over in SAGE_ROOT.
-- William
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsu
Hi all!
I solved the problem on OS X (that's to say: Sage starts, I am running
the test suite now).
The additional patch at #11900 is rather short and ready for review.
It just changes the type of some cdef attribute from into
.
With type , an integer overflow occurs on OS X, but not on my
mach
Hi William,
On 15 Jan., 21:48, William Stein wrote:
> I've killed a bunch of crap on bsd and disabled spotlight. Is it faster
> now?
Yes! Sage did build, and I can reproduce the error. Hence, I can
finally start debugging.
Thank you!
Simon
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-deve
Just to clarify - if a ticket is marked with 5.0 as the milestone, should
we be rebasing its patches to this prealpha? How about the beta you are now
constructing? Or should we continue to base them on the 4.8 series of dev
releases?
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-01-15 21:38, Simon King wrote:
>> And a few hours ago, William told me that bsd.math refers to Birch and
>> Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture...
> Really? Makes sense though, it just never occured to me. Naming an OSX
> box "bsd" because
On Jan 15, 2012 12:38 PM, "Simon King" wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> On 15 Jan., 20:36, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> > > I thought bsd is Darwin, and I further thougt Darwin is different from
> > > OS X. I already have an account on bsd and am working on the problem
> > > now.
> >
> > BSD is not Darwi
On 2012-01-15 21:38, Simon King wrote:
> And a few hours ago, William told me that bsd.math refers to Birch and
> Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture...
Really? Makes sense though, it just never occured to me. Naming an OSX
box "bsd" because Darwin is based on BSD made just enough sense to me
not to quest
On Jan 15, 2012, at 12:38 , Simon King wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On 15 Jan., 20:36, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>>> I thought bsd is Darwin, and I further thougt Darwin is different from
>>> OS X. I already have an account on bsd and am working on the problem
>>> now.
>>
>> BSD is not Darwin and D
Hi Justin,
On 15 Jan., 20:36, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> > I thought bsd is Darwin, and I further thougt Darwin is different from
> > OS X. I already have an account on bsd and am working on the problem
> > now.
>
> BSD is not Darwin and Darwin is not BSD.
And a few hours ago, William told me t
On Jan 15, 2012, at 01:18 , Simon King wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> On 15 Jan., 00:48, William Stein wrote:
>> Simon: I would love to make an account for you on
>> bsd.math.washington.edu, but it is mind-numbingly painful (if even
>> possible) to do this remotely for me. I can do it on Monday when
Hi William,
On 15 Jan., 00:48, William Stein wrote:
> Simon: I would love to make an account for you on
> bsd.math.washington.edu, but it is mind-numbingly painful (if even
> possible) to do this remotely for me. I can do it on Monday when I'm
> in my office.
I thought bsd is Darwin, and I furt
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Simon King wrote:
> On 14 Jan., 20:18, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout
>> > I have exactly the same issue on my OSX 10.6.8.
>>
>> Just to raise awareness, I want to remind people that OS X 10.7.x
>> support is a total blocker
On 14 Jan., 20:18, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout
> > I have exactly the same issue on my OSX 10.6.8.
>
> Just to raise awareness, I want to remind people that OS X 10.7.x
> support is a total blocker for Sage-5.0.
Can someone provide me with access to a mach
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:27 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>>
I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release. It's an upda
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>>> I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release. It's an updated
>>> version of the previous prealpha0. The only main change i
On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release. It's an updated
version of the previous prealpha0. The only main change is the
inclusion of the new matplotlib spkg (#11915).
Source archive:
19 matches
Mail list logo
