The current code takes an integer as coordinate input and uses the
associated affine space -> projective space embedding and changes the
defining polynomials of the subscheme appropriately. I'm not proposing
changing how that works. I'm proposing allowing the input of the ambient
projective spa
There are several possible projective embeddings for an affine object. How
do you propose to determine which one should be used?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, sen
