Hi Rob,
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
The
sick green has always been a bit jarring to my eye. Maybe a light
beige or cream? But not puce.
Done. Please see the latest patch to ticket #9850 [1]. A preview [2]
of what's to come is also attached with
On Sep 1, 11:33 pm, Niles nil...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a screenshot of some very basic changes, using the
colors from sagemath.org:
http://www.nilesjohnson.net/sage-style-docs.png
Nice, but some time ago I picked some colors for the website and if
I'll ever give it some refreshment, at
After a while, I decided to see how hard this might be to change . . .
as you would expect, it was totally trivial (at least for a first
pass). Here's a screenshot of some very basic changes, using the
colors from sagemath.org:
http://www.nilesjohnson.net/sage-style-docs.png
That's a
Hello all,
A ticket for this now exists at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9850
and it contains the patch with a screenshot.
On Sep 1, 9:21 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 9/1/10 5:17 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
The
sick green has always been a bit jarring to my
On Sep 2, 1:59 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this discussion belong (also) on sage-marketing, by the way?
Indeed; I'm forwarding it now.
Dear sage-marketing,
Here's the link to the beginning of this thread
Looks good to me too. Nice idea.
Did you experiment with the background color on the verbatim stuff
(doctests)? Looks like strings print in blue, so that probably
wouldn't be a good choice and maybe there is enough blue already. The
sick green has always been a bit jarring to my eye. Maybe a
On 9/1/10 5:17 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Looks good to me too. Nice idea.
Did you experiment with the background color on the verbatim stuff
(doctests)? Looks like strings print in blue, so that probably
wouldn't be a good choice and maybe there is enough blue already. The
sick green has always
