Re: [sage-devel] Re: core dump at end of test in 5.5.rc0

2012-12-13 Thread John Cremona
On 13 December 2012 18:24, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 6:36:29 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: >> >> When testing 5.5.rc0, newly built on a 64-bit ubuntu 12.04 machine, I >> get a failure in testing >> sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py not in any of

[sage-devel] Re: core dump at end of test in 5.5.rc0

2012-12-13 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 6:36:29 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: > > When testing 5.5.rc0, newly built on a 64-bit ubuntu 12.04 machine, I > get a failure in testing > sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py not in any of the > tests but at the end when it is quitting: > > 487 p

[sage-devel] Re: core dump

2009-09-15 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jason Moxham wrote: > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 18:37:08 Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> There is another issue which must be considered when building binaries. >> Building them on version 'n' of an operating system does not guaranatee >> they will work on 'n-1'. On Solaris, building on a late rele

[sage-devel] Re: core dump

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Moxham
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 18:37:08 Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Jason Moxham wrote: > > Thanks , but I mean the machine on which the original binarys were > > compiled on , I assume it was some box on skynet? If my fix is correct > > then gcc on that particular machine has been compiled with the d

[sage-devel] Re: core dump

2009-09-15 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jason Moxham wrote: > Thanks , but I mean the machine on which the original binarys were compiled > on , I assume it was some box on skynet? If my fix is correct then gcc on > that particular machine has been compiled with the default cpu set too high. I can't say for Linux, but I'm not aware

[sage-devel] Re: core dump

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Moxham
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 16:10:51 pang wrote: > > Which machine is the live dvd built on? > > > > Jason > > I'm not sure I understand: I used SAGE binaries. I can test the live > dvd in several machines. We've tried several already, with the result > that the binaries did not work in Pentium I

[sage-devel] Re: core dump

2009-09-15 Thread pang
> Which machine is the live dvd built on? > > Jason I'm not sure I understand: I used SAGE binaries. I can test the live dvd in several machines. We've tried several already, with the result that the binaries did not work in Pentium III or IV, and work in Core (T2000 I think) or newer, including

[sage-devel] Re: core dump

2009-09-15 Thread Jason Moxham
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 10:00:34 William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote: > >  Hello: > >  On a Pentium IV machine, two versions of sage 4.1 yield approximately > > the same error (the following is cut and paste when trying the second): > > > > /opt/sage-4.

[sage-devel] Re: core dump

2009-09-15 Thread pang
> > http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#Otherquestions > > William Thanks! Well, this raises issues for a live dvd that should work on as most computers as possible. I'll give some thought to find the best solution. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send an em

[sage-devel] Re: core dump

2009-09-15 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote: > >  Hello: >  On a Pentium IV machine, two versions of sage 4.1 yield approximately > the same error (the following is cut and paste when trying the second): > > /opt/sage-4.1.1-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-i686-Linux/local/bin/sage-sage: line > 199: 527