>
> What is OX 11.?? I know that the Sage thread was titled OS X 11.11, but I
> thought that was a typo
>
>
Yes, it is a typo (my typo, sorry). The system is OS X 10.11 (El Capitan)
but I wrote "Sage in Mac OSX 11.11 (El Capitan)" in my message of July 14
on this list, when I noticed that
On 10/08/15 09:56, François Bissey wrote:
On 10/08/15 09:42, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 11:57:22 UTC-7, Harald Schilly wrote:
I've added a very short red banner to the download osx/intel
download page for all mirrors. It does link back here to sage-devel,
t
On 10/08/15 09:42, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 11:57:22 UTC-7, Harald Schilly wrote:
I've added a very short red banner to the download osx/intel
download page for all mirrors. It does link back here to sage-devel,
to the last two threads I found about that.
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 11:11:47 UTC-7, David Roe wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 11:00:14 UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2015-10-07 19:31, David Roe wrote:
>>> > In OS X 10.11, Apple changed the operating sy
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 11:57:22 UTC-7, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> I've added a very short red banner to the download osx/intel download page
> for all mirrors. It does link back here to sage-devel, to the last two
> threads I found about that.
>
> What I don't want is to clutter the main
I've added a very short red banner to the download osx/intel download page
for all mirrors. It does link back here to sage-devel, to the last two
threads I found about that.
What I don't want is to clutter the main index.html page with this. If this
banner is not enough, then we could also add
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 11:00:14 UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-10-07 19:31, David Roe wrote:
>> > In OS X 10.11, Apple changed the operating system to no longer allow
>> > modification of certain system folders, even when l
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 11:00:14 UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2015-10-07 19:31, David Roe wrote:
> > In OS X 10.11, Apple changed the operating system to no longer allow
> > modification of certain system folders, even when logged in as root.
>
> Why would Sage need modification to s
On Wednesday, October 7, 2015, Thomas Judson wrote:
> I understand the problem a bit better now, but I haven’t tried disabling
> the system integrity protection yet.
>
>
Oh good. I thought you had. Very good to know disability sip works.
> Tom
>
> > On Oct 7, 2015, at 12:38 PM, William Stein
On Wednesday, October 7, 2015, David Roe wrote:
> I'm confused by that as well, but apparently some people have succeeded at
> building Sage after making this change. Maybe there are other ways that
> disabling SIP affects Sage's build. I was trying to describe the reasons
> that users might he
I'm confused by that as well, but apparently some people have succeeded at
building Sage after making this change. Maybe there are other ways that
disabling SIP affects Sage's build. I was trying to describe the reasons
that users might hesitate to adapt this workaround.
David
On Wed, Oct 7, 201
On 2015-10-07 19:31, David Roe wrote:
In OS X 10.11, Apple changed the operating system to no longer allow
modification of certain system folders, even when logged in as root.
Why would Sage need modification to system folders? Sage can be compiled
as an ordinary user, so I don't see how this
On Wednesday, October 7, 2015, David Roe wrote:
> The only reports I've seen, on
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/OBv5x1v3_6M, have been
> positive. What conflicting reports have you received?
>
>
>
I think Tom Judson said it doesn't work.
>
> I haven't tried it myself; I'
The only reports I've seen, on
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/OBv5x1v3_6M, have been
positive. What conflicting reports have you received? I haven't tried it
myself; I'm still running 10.9.
Here's a summary for how to disable it:
1. Reboot, holding down Cmd-R to start in Rec
On Wednesday, October 7, 2015, David Roe wrote:
> Do you want to mention the possibility of disabling system integrity
> protection, or are you purposefully avoiding that option?
> David
>
To what extent does it actually really work? To what extent? I've got
conflicting reports.
I think we s
15 matches
Mail list logo
