[sage-devel] Re: free private github repos

2014-05-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-05-16, Jason Grout wrote: > On 5/15/14, 7:36, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> And, by the way, should Sage get a DOI? >> This looks doable, only one probably needs to be an "Owner" of >> https://github.com/sagemath/sage >> and not just "team member". >> > > Interesting. So would this mean that w

[sage-devel] Re: free private github repos

2014-05-16 Thread Jason Grout
On 5/15/14, 7:36, Dima Pasechnik wrote: And, by the way, should Sage get a DOI? This looks doable, only one probably needs to be an "Owner" of https://github.com/sagemath/sage and not just "team member". Interesting. So would this mean that we can tell people at http://wiki.sagemath.org/Publ

Re: [sage-devel] Re: free private github repos

2014-05-15 Thread John Cremona
On 15 May 2014 15:25, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Volker Braun > wrote: > > Of course I'm not going to say no to free stuff, but hosting your own > > unlimited number of private repos (and/or a gitolite installation, as we > do > > for Sage) is pretty simple ;-) > > F

Re: [sage-devel] Re: free private github repos

2014-05-15 Thread William Stein
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Of course I'm not going to say no to free stuff, but hosting your own > unlimited number of private repos (and/or a gitolite installation, as we do > for Sage) is pretty simple ;-) >From my perspective there is a little bit more going on, I'm

Re: [sage-devel] Re: free private github repos

2014-05-15 Thread John Cremona
On 15 May 2014 13:36, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > And, by the way, should Sage get a DOI? > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier if you, like me, had forgotten what a DOI might be... > This looks doable, only one probably needs to be an "Owner" of > https://github.com/sagemat

[sage-devel] Re: free private github repos

2014-05-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
And, by the way, should Sage get a DOI? This looks doable, only one probably needs to be an "Owner" of https://github.com/sagemath/sage and not just "team member". I suggest we look into this when 6.3 is released, cause the process might actually need a release to be made to get a DOI, i.e. it's

Re: [sage-devel] Re: free private github repos

2014-05-15 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
On 05/15/2014 10:55 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Of course I'm not going to say no to free stuff, but hosting your own > unlimited number of private repos (and/or a gitolite installation, as we do > for Sage) is pretty simple ;-) Bsst! Not so loud! ;-) If people knew how easy it is to share gi

[sage-devel] Re: free private github repos

2014-05-15 Thread Volker Braun
Of course I'm not going to say no to free stuff, but hosting your own unlimited number of private repos (and/or a gitolite installation, as we do for Sage) is pretty simple ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from