[sage-devel] Re: hg clone revisited...

2008-06-24 Thread Glenn H Tarbox, PhD
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 21:08 -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Jun 17, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD wrote: > > > So, my conclusion is that we should be using branch instead of > > clone as > > the general development strategy with clone limited to those who are > > working specific typ

[sage-devel] Re: hg clone revisited...

2008-06-24 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Jun 17, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD wrote: > So, my conclusion is that we should be using branch instead of > clone as > the general development strategy with clone limited to those who are > working specific types of problems and need to deal with it. > > All this leads to one of

[sage-devel] Re: hg clone revisited...

2008-06-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > by popular demand, I've reluctantly agreed to bring up hg clone yet > again because I think that beating a dead horse is under-rated you > can never beat a dead horse enough!! > > Turns out, there are 2, and I'