On Apr 23, 10:44 am, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> The `symbolic_inverse` function you posted on ask.sagemath looks good.
> I might suggest catching the RuntimeError when no roots are found and
> raising a more informative error, e.g. "Sage could not find a symbolic
> inverse" ...
I am thinking about d
The `symbolic_inverse` function you posted on ask.sagemath looks good.
I might suggest catching the RuntimeError when no roots are found and
raising a more informative error, e.g. "Sage could not find a symbolic
inverse" ...
--
Benjamin Jones
benjaminfjo...@gmail.com
On Apr 23, 3:38 am, Kelvin Li
On Apr 23, 1:22 am, Kelvin Li wrote:
> On Apr 14, 1:09 pm, Kelvin Li wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 14, 1:03 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> > > Hi Kelvin,
>
> > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > > Kelvin Li wrote:
> > > > Is anybody working on implementing something similar to mathematica
On Apr 14, 1:09 pm, Kelvin Li wrote:
> On Apr 14, 1:03 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Kelvin,
>
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Kelvin Li wrote:
> > > Is anybody working on implementing something similar to mathematica's
> > > InverseFunction? Or is there already a trac
On Apr 14, 1:03 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Kelvin,
>
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
> Kelvin Li wrote:
> > Is anybody working on implementing something similar to mathematica's
> > InverseFunction? Or is there already a trac ticket out there? If there
> > is interest and it i
