[sage-devel] Re: licensing terms of FSA Python package

2009-02-25 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:06 AM, William Stein wrote: > >> I grant the user the right to use PyFSA under GPLv2 or any later version of >> GPL. >> >> -- Oliver > > Awesome! Many thanks!! That will make it much easier. Excellent! I'll play with PyFSA and attempt to integrate it with Sage. --

[sage-devel] Re: licensing terms of FSA Python package

2009-02-25 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Oliver Steele wrote: > On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:30 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> Just a heads up.  We currently have a policy not to include standard >> any code that is >> (L)GPLv3 licensed in Sage.   We can include GPLv2+ code, i.e., "the >> author grants the >> u

[sage-devel] Re: licensing terms of FSA Python package

2009-02-25 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > Dear Oliver, > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Oliver Steele wrote: >> Hello. >> >> It was licensed under some ancient version of the OSI Artistic License, >> mostly for historical reasons. >> >> I hereby license it to you under the term

[sage-devel] Re: licensing terms of FSA Python package

2009-02-25 Thread Minh Nguyen
Dear Oliver, On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Oliver Steele wrote: > Hello. > > It was licensed under some ancient version of the OSI Artistic License, > mostly for historical reasons. > > I hereby license it to you under the terms of the LGPLv3 license: > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/lgpl