2008/10/17 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A few things that Craig didn't catch: :)
>
> Thanks!
>
>> page 7: the exponent should be k, not 2k
>> page 9: "since such formulas perhaps do not exist" sounds weird to me;
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few things that Craig didn't catch: :)
Thanks!
> page 7: the exponent should be k, not 2k
> page 9: "since such formulas perhaps do not exist" sounds weird to me; I
> would say "since no such formulas are currently known
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Craig Citro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> Looks great. If the last talk got me in the mood to work, this one has
> me incredibly fired up! :)
Same here!
>
> Some minor corrections:
>
> page 5: upper triangule -> upper triangular
> page 21: Mestra
A few things that Craig didn't catch: :)
page 7: the exponent should be k, not 2k
page 9: "since such formulas perhaps do not exist" sounds weird to me; I
would say "since no such formulas are currently known"
page 10: "then have basis" should be "then have bases"
page 16: "are beautiful piece"
Hi William,
Looks great. If the last talk got me in the mood to work, this one has
me incredibly fired up! :)
Some minor corrections:
page 5: upper triangule -> upper triangular
page 21: Mestra -> Mestre
page 21: another modular X -> another module X (or possibly a different wording)
page 21: o
