On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:18 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune wrote:
> On Jun 27, 11:50 am, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Friday 27 June 2008 04:59:37 am Burcin Erocal wrote:
>>
>> In general, the difference between
>> multivariate and univariate should not matter in practice.
>>
> +1
On Jun 27, 11:50 am, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 27 June 2008 04:59:37 am Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> In general, the difference between
> multivariate and univariate should not matter in practice.
>
+1.
E.g. exponents() on univariate ring returns a list of int, while
exp
On Friday 27 June 2008 04:59:37 am Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Bjarke Hammersholt Roune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is definitely a bug since the docs explicitly say:
> > > "PolynomialRing(base_ring, name, sparse=False) returns a univariate
> > > p
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Bjarke Hammersholt Roune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is definitely a bug since the docs explicitly say:
> > "PolynomialRing(base_ring, name, sparse=False) returns a univariate
> > polynomial ring; all other input formats return a multivariate
>
> This is definitely a bug since the docs explicitly say:
> "PolynomialRing(base_ring, name, sparse=False) returns a univariate
> polynomial ring; all other input formats return a multivariate
> polynomial ring." and name is by definition a string.
>
> To get a multivariate polynomial ring in 1 va
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I cannot figure out how to force sage to construct a ring as a multivariate
> ring with only a single generator. In the past, I used MPolynomialRing to
> force multi-variate implementation, but that is now depr
