On Monday, March 19, 2012 2:44:08 AM UTC+1, Keshav Kini wrote:
>
> It's to move *requests to become* GSoC students to a different list.
>
To defend why i wrote sage-devel in the beginning, this is exactly how
sympy does it. We should keep introductions and gsoc program specific
stuff in sage-
On 19 March 2012 02:06, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 at 06:44PM -0700, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> Dan Drake writes:
>> > I'm afraid that, by pushing GSoC students to a different list, we would
>> > be in effect creating two classes of developers. It would be a bit like
>> > having the "grown
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 at 06:44PM -0700, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Dan Drake writes:
> > I'm afraid that, by pushing GSoC students to a different list, we would
> > be in effect creating two classes of developers. It would be a bit like
> > having the "grownups table" and "kids table" at holiday meals.
>
Dan Drake writes:
> I'm afraid that, by pushing GSoC students to a different list, we would
> be in effect creating two classes of developers. It would be a bit like
> having the "grownups table" and "kids table" at holiday meals.
I don't think the point is to move GSoC students to a different li
Hi, I've created https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sage-gsoc
H
On Saturday, March 17, 2012 6:58:10 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Would anyone else like to see all this google stuff moved to a
> different mailing list?
>
> John
>
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@g
