On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Franco Saliola wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23-Jan-09, at 7:33 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Robert Miller
>>> wrote:
> I've used it several times and see no reason
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>
> On 23-Jan-09, at 7:33 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Robert Miller
>> wrote:
>>>
I've used it several times and see no reason at
all to remove it.
>>>
>>> Redundancy is one reason I can thin
I tried doing the following:
sage: p = Primes()
sage: p??
and it hangs. So after 4-5 seconds I hit Ctrl-C, at which point it
shows me what I want.
But then I tried again and let it sit for longer. It started using
100% of my CPU. After 30s or so, I hit Ctrl-C and it gave me a
Traceback. See bel
Nice debate. I did not know this was there, but now that I do I think
I'll start to use it!
John
On 23 Jan, 19:13, Craig Citro wrote:
> > -1 to removing it. I've used it several times and see no reason at
> > all to remove it.
> > I use it! Actually in my first notebook. Please don't remove.
> -1 to removing it. I've used it several times and see no reason at
> all to remove it.
> I use it! Actually in my first notebook. Please don't remove.
>
Wow, ok. I had no idea people really used it -- I thought it just sat untouched.
In that case, I rescind my '+1'.
-cc
--~--~-~--
On 23-Jan-09, at 7:33 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Robert Miller
> wrote:
>>
>>> I've used it several times and see no reason at
>>> all to remove it.
>>
>> Redundancy is one reason I can think of. Is there any functionality
>> you can get out of this that you
I use it! Actually in my first notebook. Please don't remove.
On Jan 23, 1:43 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> Does anyone use this module anymore? It seems, well, a little silly...
>
> sage: P = Primes()
> sage: P
> Set of all prime numbers: 2, 3, 5, 7, ...
> sage: 3 in P
> True
> sage: 4 in P
> Fals
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
>> I've used it several times and see no reason at
>> all to remove it.
>
> Redundancy is one reason I can think of. Is there any functionality
> you can get out of this that you can't just get out of is_prime,
> primes, or prime_range?
If
> I've used it several times and see no reason at
> all to remove it.
Redundancy is one reason I can think of. Is there any functionality
you can get out of this that you can't just get out of is_prime,
primes, or prime_range?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
>
>> Does anyone use this module anymore? It seems, well, a little silly...
>>
>> sage: P = Primes()
>
> +1 to removing this.
-1 to removing it. I've used it several times and see no reason at
all to remove it.
William
--~--~-~--~---
> Does anyone use this module anymore? It seems, well, a little silly...
>
> sage: P = Primes()
+1 to removing this.
-cc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
