On Friday, May 9, 2014 12:35:30 PM UTC-7, jason wrote:
Mike Hansen and I had a conversation about this at one point, and I
> think we concluded that instead of looking at the base ring in the case
> of SR, we should instead look at the specific matrix and decide if it
> was "exact" or an approx
(CCd to sage-devel)
On 5/9/14, 13:32, David Guichard wrote:
Is there some deep reason I'm not seeing that G-S doesn't work for SR?
It seems like everything should be fine. Is the problem in detecting
dependent sets over SR? This keeps me from being able to do simple
examples for a linear algebra
