On 4-Jul-09, at 07:27 , Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> On 2-Jul-09, at 13:29 , Robert Miller wrote:
>
>> Source tarball:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/
>> sage-4.1.alpha3.tar
>
> Sage-4.1.alpha3 built OK on 32 bit ubuntu 9.04 on an Atom N270.
>
> Other than two tests which t
On 2-Jul-09, at 13:29 , Robert Miller wrote:
> Source tarball:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/
> sage-4.1.alpha3.tar
Sage-4.1.alpha3 built OK on 32 bit ubuntu 9.04 on an Atom N270.
Other than two tests which timed out, the following tests failed:
sage -t -long
On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:29 , Robert Miller wrote:
>
> Source tarball:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/
> sage-4.1.alpha3.tar
>
> sage.math binary:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha3-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
>
> Upgrade URL:
>
I got the same as Marshall (same machine+OS) but with one addition:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/a_tour_of_sage/index.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/darwin_utilities.pyx"
sage -
2009/7/2 Robert Miller :
>
>> but on 32-bit ubuntu I also get this in the file where a previous
>> failure was fixed by the merged patch at #6446:
>>
>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_plot.py"
>>
>> On reattempt this did pass, but it is a little worrying.
>
> What was the failure?
>From source on 64-bit Kubuntu 9.04 on Intel Core Duo:
sage -t devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/darwin_utilities.pyx # 3 doctests failed
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-de
On an intel mac running 10.4.11, I get:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/darwin_utilities.pyx"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.p
On Jul 2, 10:29 am, Robert Miller wrote:
>
> This is my current list for rc0, aside from getting someone to fix
> #6448:
For those of us who don't like warning when building the reference
manual, would you consider #6435? It's a pretty trivial patch and has
a positive review.
John
--~--~---
For #6448, I just uploaded a patch, that now needs review.
Could someone please also have a look at the doctest patch at #6379
and review it (very easy one)? Thanks!
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
> but on 32-bit ubuntu I also get this in the file where a previous
> failure was fixed by the merged patch at #6446:
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_plot.py"
>
> On reattempt this did pass, but it is a little worrying.
What was the failure?
--~--~-~--~~
On 64-bit ubuntu I get just the known 2 failures:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/misc/darwin_utilities.pyx"
but on 32-bit ubuntu I also get this in the file where a previous
failure was fixed by the merge
11 matches
Mail list logo
