> How about a function, somewhat like search_doc, search_def, and friends,
> that accepts an object and a string, and returns methods that match that
> string? Would you find that useful?
I think this is a good idea, but can't resist...
> Often, I find myself doing
>
> X.a (look through
> How about a function, somewhat like search_doc, search_def, and friends,
> that accepts an object and a string, and returns methods that match that
> string? Would you find that useful?
In my haste to plug sage-mode, I forgot this:
sage: X.*foo*?
...
all methods that match 'foo'.
Only in IPyth
On 10/20/10 12:35 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 at 09:43PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
If you used emacs sage-mode, tab complete would bring up a buffer of
completions for X., which you could then interactively search
(and regexp search), or run M-x occur to find all occurences, etc.
On 10/20/10 6:46 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 at 05:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
We've had discussions about changing the tab completion so that an
odd number of tabs does what happens now, and an even number of tabs
(e.g., two tabs) does X.*foo*?. Do you see an easy way to do tha
On Oct 20, 10:26 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 10/20/10 6:46 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 at 05:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> We've had discussions about changing the tab completion so that an
> >> odd number of tabs does what happens now, and an even number of tabs
> >> (e
Maybe there's an advantage in change from
X.ker (look through "ker*" methods...)
to
X.ker (look through methods that contain "ker" in name ...)
In fact, it's what
X. (look through "*" methods...)
do.
Pedro
On Oct 20, 5:24 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> Here's something that happens t
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 at 09:43PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
> If you used emacs sage-mode, tab complete would bring up a buffer of
> completions for X., which you could then interactively search
> (and regexp search), or run M-x occur to find all occurences, etc. In
> my opinion, this is more flexi
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 at 05:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> We've had discussions about changing the tab completion so that an
> odd number of tabs does what happens now, and an even number of tabs
> (e.g., two tabs) does X.*foo*?. Do you see an easy way to do that?
> I think making such a change w
