[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-12-01 Thread Georg S. Weber
Here's the latest list:          algebra        AlexGhitza               algebraic geometry      AlexGhitza               algebraic topology      jhpalmieri               basic arithmetic        AlexGhitza               build   tbd     The trac component build is certainly one, that I

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-11-30 Thread mhampton
Oh, I thought 'tbd' was 'the benevolent dictator' :) -Marshall On Nov 30, 3:52 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: William Stein wrote: Hi, Here are the trac components with who owns each. It's possible that many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-30 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2009-Oct-28 23:56:12 -0700, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: freebsd tbd Since I seem to be the only person doing anything with FreeBSD, I guess I'll take this one. -- Peter Jeremy pgpNq7acLO05E.pgp Description: PGP signature

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi William, On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:56 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here are the trac components with who owns each. It's possible that many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi William, On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:56 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here are the trac components with who owns each. It's possible that many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point.

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: Hi, Here are the trac components with who owns each. It's possible that many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just respond in this thread.Don't ask me exactly what it

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread David Joyner
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:56 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here are the trac components with who owns each.  It's possible that many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point.  If anybody would like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just respond in

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread mhampton
I'm clearly the wrong person to own statistics. I just created that component to try to get it started, but I have neither the time nor expertise to do any real coding or leading for it. -Marshall On Oct 29, 1:56 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here are the trac components

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread kcrisman
While we're talking about components, can we add symbolics back? I'm not sure whether I should own it (Burcin? before it was gfurnish, which I assume is outdated now) but it would be very valuable to have that as an option. As for meaning, at the least it should mean that that person gets an

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: William Stein wrote: Hi, Here are the trac components with who owns each.  It's possible that many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point.  If anybody would like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:27 AM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:56 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here are the trac components with who owns each.  It's possible that many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point.  If anybody would like

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:18 AM, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote: I'm clearly the wrong person to own statistics.  I just created that component to try to get it started, but I have neither the time nor expertise to do any real coding or leading for it. I've changed the owner to Andrew

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:42 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: While we're talking about components, can we add symbolics back? I'm not sure whether I should own it (Burcin? before it was gfurnish, which I assume is outdated now) but it would be very valuable to have that as an option.

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread kcrisman
What is the difference between symbolics and calculus? Calculus is actual calculus. Symbolics is exposing symbolics of Maxima, Pynac etc. to users in the rest of Sage. So, for instance, R. Marik's question about getting Maxima's 1#0 to turn into 1!=0 is a symbolics issue, and so is

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:59 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: What is the difference between symbolics and calculus? Calculus is actual calculus.  Symbolics is exposing symbolics of Maxima, Pynac etc. to users in the rest of Sage.  So, for instance, R. Marik's question about

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01:01PM -0700, William Stein wrote: The current list is: algebra tbd algebraic geometry was algebraic topology jhpalmieri basic arithmeticsomebody Hi, I can look after algebra and basic

[sage-devel] Re: trac component ownership

2009-10-29 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01:01PM -0700, William Stein wrote: The current list is:       algebra         tbd       algebraic geometry      was       algebraic topology      jhpalmieri       basic arithmetic