[sage-devel] Really weird layout/name/number for 'fortran' package.

2010-06-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
The fortran package in Sage is really weird. 1) The 'src' directory does not contain unchanged upstream code, but has a command called 'sage_fortran' burried well down in the directory structure, which is a binary of g95, version 4.0.3 2) But at the top level there is another command called '

Re: [sage-devel] Really weird layout/name/number for 'fortran' package.

2010-06-01 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > The fortran package in Sage is really weird. > > 1) The 'src' directory does not contain unchanged upstream code, but has a > command called 'sage_fortran' burried well down in the directory structure, > which is a binary of g95, version 4

Re: [sage-devel] Really weird layout/name/number for 'fortran' package.

2010-06-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/ 1/10 09:09 AM, William Stein wrote: On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: The fortran package in Sage is really weird. 1) The 'src' directory does not contain unchanged upstream code, but has a command called 'sage_fortran' burried well down in the directory structur

Re: [sage-devel] Really weird layout/name/number for 'fortran' package.

2010-06-02 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 06/ 1/10 09:09 AM, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Dr. David Kirkby >>  wrote: >>> >>> The fortran package in Sage is really weird. >>> >>> 1) The 'src' directory does not contain unchanged upstream code, but