Re: [sage-devel] Reference manual broken in sagemath.org

2012-06-14 Thread Volker Braun
While its certainly impressive that there are apache processes with >30GB resident ram usage(!), that alone shouldn't be enough to drag boxen down. There are also about 5000 git processes in the zombie state, owned by www-data. Whoever is serving /home/git/repositories/sage.git over http is doi

Re: [sage-devel] Reference manual broken in sagemath.org

2012-06-14 Thread Jonathan Bober
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi Jeroen, > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: >>> Thank you very much for the report.  The problem has been fixed now. >> Do you know what happened before, what went wrong? > > It has to do with the memory consumpti

Re: [sage-devel] Reference manual broken in sagemath.org

2012-06-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jeroen, On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> Thank you very much for the report. The problem has been fixed now. > Do you know what happened before, what went wrong? It has to do with the memory consumption of Sphinx. The HTML version of the reference manual refused to

Re: [sage-devel] Reference manual broken in sagemath.org

2012-06-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-06-14 07:21, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:24 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: >> Reference manual broken in sagemath.org >> For instance: >> http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/symbolic/expression.html >> http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/index.html > > Thank you ver

Re: [sage-devel] Reference manual broken in sagemath.org

2012-06-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:24 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: > Reference manual broken in sagemath.org > For instance: > http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/symbolic/expression.html > http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/index.html Thank you very much for the report. The problem has been fixed now