Some time ago, I was annoying you guys for issues with transforms and stuff like that.
On 20 Mar, 01:35, Maurizio <maurizio.gran...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, up to now, my wishlist is: > - better Laplace, Fourier, Zeta, any othertransformmanagement > (especially in symbolic) > - unit of measurement integration > - extensible comparison between different implementations of all those > features in the different packages (better to do the limit/integral/ > anything else with maxima, or with sympy, or with sympycore, or with > pynac???) > - NEW: labels in the notebook :) colors would be VERY nice as well! > Just today, I went through this very interesting implementation of DiracDelta function in SymPy: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=672&can=1&q=diracdelta I know there is a lot of development undergoing pynac right now, so I would like Burcin et al. to deeply consider the implementation of this function (and Heaviside() and others needed) to speed up and make easier to deal with Fourier / Laplace (and any other) transform (series). Of course, I would really like to already have those functionalities already available in SymPy (I really go for Ondrej's really physics related approach to symbolics), but the basis are already there. I'm also hoping that SAGE's symbolics is considering this as a MUST :) This can be very useful now IMHO, even because integration is not yet assessed, so there is still room for design related thinking. Best regards Maurizio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
