In case it matters, I have just uploaded Sagetex 3.2 to CTAN.
Not sure whether Debian does any synchronisation of Sagetex@CTAN with
Sagtex @ sage - hopefully it does not break anything for you.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/01/2019 10:31, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 1:11 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:14 PM Samuel Lelievre
> wrote:
> >
> > Mon 2019-01-07 14:09:18 UTC, Thierry:
> > >
> > > In his email, Tobias pointed the link (after the signature):
> > >
> > > [3] https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_polic
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:14 PM Samuel Lelievre
wrote:
>
> Mon 2019-01-07 14:09:18 UTC, Thierry:
> >
> > In his email, Tobias pointed the link (after the signature):
> >
> > [3] https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Tobias, what would be the other problematic p
Mon 2019-01-07 14:09:18 UTC, Thierry:
>
> In his email, Tobias pointed the link (after the signature):
>
> [3] https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html
>
> [...]
>
> Tobias, what would be the other problematic packages or issues?
> What should we focus on?
There is now a "Sage Buster
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 4:07 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2019-01-13 15:34, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > As we see, Debian is already picking up this update.
>
> If Debian *already* has it anyway, what's the point of upgrading it in
> SageMath? Especially if it doesn't require any changes to the S
On 2019-01-13 15:34, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
As we see, Debian is already picking up this update.
If Debian *already* has it anyway, what's the point of upgrading it in
SageMath? Especially if it doesn't require any changes to the Sage library.
--
You received this message because you are subs
Could we merge the sagetex update on #27024 into 8.6, still?
As we see, Debian is already picking up this update.
Thanks,
Dima
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/01/2019 10:31, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > sagetex 3.1 does not correspond to anything on the upstream
sagetex 3.1 does not correspond to anything on the upstream repo. I
pulled it as it was broken in various ways, don't use it.
Please switch to https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex/releases/tag/3.2
Thanks,
Dima
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 2:07 AM Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 09/01/2019 21:4
Perhaps we can also include in 8.6 the update to sagetex which is
currently under review on
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27024 and has Debian patches merged,
and appears to work on py3 too
thanks to many other patches...
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 3:00 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Getting back o
Getting back on the general topic
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:09 PM Thierry wrote:
> After a very quick look at the Debian build logs, regarding numpy, some
> errors are due to te fact that 1.16 is not out yet (hence not in sage),
> but Debian uses its release candidate.
>
> Gap 4.10 is merged,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 07/01/2019 18:07, E. Madison Bray wrote:
> > Sage 8.6 will also require an update of cysignals to 1.8.1. Is that
> > in the works? How would I ago about updating that package?
>
> I will take care of the packaging of cygsignal
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:38:40PM +0100, E. Madison Bray wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:28 AM Tobias Hansen wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/19 1:18 PM, Thierry wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-devel
> > > mailing-list what should be done
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 2:38 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:28 AM Tobias Hansen wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/19 1:18 PM, Thierry wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-devel
> > > mailing-list what should be done soon so that
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:28 AM Tobias Hansen wrote:
>
> On 1/5/19 1:18 PM, Thierry wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-devel
> > mailing-list what should be done soon so that 8.6 could enter forthcoming
> > buster release with recent dependencies
On 1/5/19 1:18 PM, Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-devel
> mailing-list what should be done soon so that 8.6 could enter forthcoming
> buster release with recent dependencies (gap 4.10, etc) ? Also, what are
> the deadlines ?
>
> In particula
Hi,
could Debian maintainers please explicitely tell us on the sage-devel
mailing-list what should be done soon so that 8.6 could enter forthcoming
buster release with recent dependencies (gap 4.10, etc) ? Also, what are
the deadlines ?
In particular, i noticed that networkx in buster will be ver
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:41 AM Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>
> Well, python3 builtin "round" calls the method "__round__" of the objects,
> which does not exist for sage objects so far and which is expected to do
> something different from what sage does with its methods .round
>
> See ticket http
Also, Samuel, could you forward this to debian-science-sage mailing
list?On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:02 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> The freeze period for the next Debian release starts on
> 12 January 2019, as discussed at
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22626#comment:11
Well, python3 builtin "round" calls the method "__round__" of the objects,
which does not exist for sage objects so far and which is expected to do
something different from what sage does with its methods .round
See ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25827
F
Le mardi 6 novembre 2018 10:31
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:12 PM David Roe wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:02 AM Samuel Lelièvre
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear sage-devel,
>>
>> The freeze period for the next Debian release starts on
>> 12 January 2019, as discussed at
>>
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22626#comment:118
>>
>
On 2018-11-06 10:04, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
> ("round,ceil,floor in python semantics"
I am curious: What is this about?
Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, se
Hello,
Being somewhat pessimistic, I would say that chances are very small that
sage will be fully python3 compliant by then. For the moment, only 2 or 3
people are actively working on the problem. Erik and Jeroen have apparently
turned their attention to other important matters. There remains
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:02 AM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> The freeze period for the next Debian release starts on
> 12 January 2019, as discussed at
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22626#comment:118
>
> This conditions what functionality users of Debian and its
> derivat
Dear sage-devel,
The freeze period for the next Debian release starts on
12 January 2019, as discussed at
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22626#comment:118
This conditions what functionality users of Debian and its
derivatives (including Ubuntu) will find in Sage for the next
two years, if th
24 matches
Mail list logo
