Instructions for Testsuite().run() can be found at
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/misc/sage_unittest.html
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
On Fri, 25 May 2012 at 02:39PM -0700, john_perry_usm wrote:
> Hello
>
> (1) I'm trying to bring doctest coverage of sage.numerical to 100%.
I don't have any help for your doctesting, but be aware that at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/2607 I have a big
patch that hits a coup
The sage-coverage script doesn't handle cython files very well. I have an
OLD ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1795 addressing some
of these issues. But I'm sure it doesn't currently apply.
David
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:39 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
> Hello
>
> (1) I'm trying
Hello
(1) I'm trying to bring doctest coverage of sage.numerical to 100%.
When I test for coverage, it says that, for example, the functions
add_variable() and solve() of glpk_backend.pyx are missing
documentation.
But, they're *not* missing documentation. It's right there in the
file, immediatel
