Hi sage-devel,
I think 1) should be the default but I find myself needing 2) quite a
bit these days (also for integers)
Cheers,
Martin
Vincent Delecroix writes:
> Hello,
>
> While responding to this ask question
>
> http://ask.sagemath.org/question/31740/why-112321-and-111320
>
> I discovered so
On 2015-12-22 00:31, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> 1) the unique x' between [0,y) of the form x + ny (used when both x
> and y are integers)
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving email
On 2015-12-22 09:59, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
Other option would be to remove it for non-integer arguments.
-1
Modulo can be useful for floating-point numbers and it makes sense
mathematically.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
I discovered some inconsistencies with the modulo operators in Sage. We
indeed have three coexisting definitions for x % y
1) the unique x' between [0,y) of the form x + ny (used when both x and y
are integers)
2) the unique x' between (-y/2, y
Hello,
While responding to this ask question
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/31740/why-112321-and-111320
I discovered some inconsistencies with the modulo operators in Sage. We
indeed have three coexisting definitions for x % y
1) the unique x' between [0,y) of the form x + ny (used when
