Re: [sage-devel] polymake-3.1 build fails with std::__::numeric_limits<...>

2019-03-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
As you can see, polymake 3.1 is not packaged for OSX 10.13, and 10.14, either, see https://polymake.org/doku.php/download/versions Perhaps it means it does not work... So that's not something that can be helped with (polymake is an experimental Sage package, so no wonder it might be broken somewhe

[sage-devel] polymake-3.1 build fails with std::__::numeric_limits<...>

2019-03-13 Thread Harly Hallikas
I'm not really C++ specialist, therefore, I'm not even trying to fix it myself. Looks like the numeric_types are already defined in stdlib. Attached the log file.. Computer 2018 MacBookPro (Core i9), macOS Mojave Version 10.14.3 (18D109) -- You received this message because you are subscrib

[sage-devel] polymake interface merged in 8.0.beta1; needs users, developers for integrating polymake features

2017-04-06 Thread Matthias Koeppe
polymake (https://polymake.org/doku.php) is an excellent, mature, and actively maintained open source system for interactive computations in polyhedral geometry (and matroids, tropical geometry, ...), developed since 1997 by Ewgenij Gawrilow and Michael Joswig and various contributors (https://

[sage-devel] polymake wrapper

2011-09-05 Thread Burcin Erocal
Hi, I just uploaded a prototype python wrapper for the new library interface to polymake on bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/burcin/pypolymake The docstrings in polymake.pyx contain examples of what is possible right now: https://bitbucket.org/burcin/pypolymake/src/tip/polymake.pyx#cl-105 The

[sage-devel] Polymake/ Are the Sage polytope constructors (too) slow?

2010-12-02 Thread jplab
My message is in two parts. The first one is more about Polymake vs Sage. The second is about how polytopes are constructed in Sage. For a couple of weeks now, I need to work with polytopes and the Polyhedron class. I'm a student currently at Techniche Universität Berlin, so Polyma

[sage-devel] Polymake Status / Porta

2009-11-02 Thread Chris Swierczewski
Hello, I see that in the past there was some interest in polymake. I'm suddenly interested as well in the package and was wondering if anyone out there had done any work on it since the most recent discussion in the mailing list back in June: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thre

[sage-devel] polymake build?

2009-06-27 Thread Carlo Hamalainen
Hi, I know there are some people interested in polymake so I thought I'd ask here: can anyone even compile polymake-2.9.6? After sorting out a few dependency issues, "make configure" fails with this on Ubuntu 9.04: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/carlo/Desktop/polymake-2.9.6/.bootstrap/Term-

[sage-devel] polymake and other optional spkg

2009-06-14 Thread William Stein
Hi, In case anybody cares about the optional Sage polymake spkg, I've moved it from optional to experimental, since it doesn't work at all. See below.Also, note that the fricas spkg no longer works (unless the user has clisp systemwide) because we switched to ECL for our lisp. I've tested a

[sage-devel] polymake

2008-12-23 Thread William Stein
Hi, I propose moving the polymake spkg to be experimental instead of optional. If anybody cares, please respond to this email. It's crystal clear having looked at the polymake spkg tonight that not a single person has successfully installed polymake in several months. See: http://trac.sagemat