Hi
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 15:05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Thanks. Indeed, libffi is alive and well:
>
> ...
> checking for ffi_closure_alloc in -lffi... yes
> checking ffi/ffi.h usability... no
> checking ffi/ffi.h presence... no
> checking for ffi/ffi.h... no
> checking ffi.h usability... yes
>
Thanks. Indeed, libffi is alive and well:
...
checking for ffi_closure_alloc in -lffi... yes
checking ffi/ffi.h usability... no
checking ffi/ffi.h presence... no
checking for ffi/ffi.h... no
checking ffi.h usability... yes
checking ffi.h presence... yes
checking for ffi.h... yes
checking whether w
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:20 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-05-14 at 12:12 +0100, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > >
> > > The other possibility is that the linker is told not to look for
> > > system-wide libffi - can this be achieved with -L and -Wl,-rpath ?
> > >
> > > On the other hand,
On Fri, 2021-05-14 at 12:12 +0100, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > The other possibility is that the linker is told not to look for
> > system-wide libffi - can this be achieved with -L and -Wl,-rpath ?
> >
> > On the other hand, it's a bug in maxima, which does not try to check
> > for presense of
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:17 PM Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 13:12, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:53 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:21 AM Jan Groenewald wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 14 May 2021
Hi
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 13:12, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:53 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:21 AM Jan Groenewald wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 11:26, François Bissey
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> It looks like maxima.f
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:53 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:21 AM Jan Groenewald wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 11:26, François Bissey wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks like maxima.fas has not been built. Last time I saw that happen
> >> in sage-on-gentoo was
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:21 AM Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 11:26, François Bissey wrote:
>>
>> It looks like maxima.fas has not been built. Last time I saw that happen
>> in sage-on-gentoo was because the patch to build it was missing.
>> Not sure how it could happen
Hi
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 11:26, François Bissey wrote:
> It looks like maxima.fas has not been built. Last time I saw that happen
> in sage-on-gentoo was because the patch to build it was missing.
> Not sure how it could happen on your setup, the log needs further
> inspection.
>
> > On 14/05/2
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:19 AM John Cremona wrote:
>
> I have been installing sage-9.3 from the tarball on a few ubuntu
> machines, just doing ./configure and then make. On one machine
> running ubuntu 20.04.02 LTS maxima fails to build. I have attached
> the log files.
>
> This is a machine o
It looks like maxima.fas has not been built. Last time I saw that happen
in sage-on-gentoo was because the patch to build it was missing.
Not sure how it could happen on your setup, the log needs further inspection.
> On 14/05/2021, at 21:18, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I have been installing sage-9
11 matches
Mail list logo
