Re: [sage-devel] propcalc vs sat

2014-09-03 Thread Thierry
Hi, On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Oh, looks like we never implemented that, but we should (it's straight > forward). This is now: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16924 Thanks for the answer and for opening the ticket, i was not sure since it not a p

Re: [sage-devel] propcalc vs sat

2014-09-03 Thread Martin Albrecht
Oh, looks like we never implemented that, but we should (it's straight forward). This is now: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16924 Cheers, Martin On Tuesday 02 Sep 2014 22:05:29 Thierry wrote: > Hi, > > looking at this ask question : > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/24024/satisfying-ass

[sage-devel] propcalc vs sat

2014-09-02 Thread Thierry
Hi, looking at this ask question : http://ask.sagemath.org/question/24024/satisfying-assignments/ i tried to turn a propcalc formula into a sat (DIMACS) one since those two sage modules are intimately related. The only candidate i found on the propcalc side is the .satformat() but then i could no