Re: [IPython-dev] [sage-devel] Re: Jupyter notebook by default?

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:04 AM, kcrisman wrote: > These all sound like awesome ideas to me for moving more *robustly* to a > sws -> ipynb transition! Would attached files work properly (or at all)? > I'm only asking out of ignorance. > No, attached files would likely be

Re: [IPython-dev] [sage-devel] Re: Jupyter notebook by default?

These all sound like awesome ideas to me for moving more *robustly* to a sws -> ipynb transition! Would attached files work properly (or at all)? I'm only asking out of ignorance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [IPython-dev] [sage-devel] Re: Jupyter notebook by default?

Thanks Jason for cross-posting. Since the issue of funding was brought up, I think supporting projects like this is exactly the sort of thing we should be doing with the funding we have, whether the work sits on the Jupyter or Sage side (I assume there will be both). It’s a bit tricky to keep

Re: [IPython-dev] [sage-devel] Re: Jupyter notebook by default?

Hi, On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:48:05AM +0100, MinRK wrote: [...] >- document conversion from sagenb to ipynb We should probably better focus on a good rst2ipynb translator. Indeed, there is a "sage -sws2rst" command already. This will have the benefit to be helpful for more people than just