On Thursday 22 July 2010, Tom Boothby wrote:
> > I should point out that the strategy for multiplication in Tom and
> > Robert's paper http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1413 is likely to be better.
> > Judging from the timings in that paper we are about a factor of two
> > behind them. I plan to implement/
Hi Carl, yep good idea. Btw. we are blue and Magma is red in this benchmark.
On 22 July 2010 23:31, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Martin Albrecht
> wrote:
> ...
>
> Pretty pictures! It would be nice, though, to have some sort of
> indication on the picture whether Magma i
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
...
Pretty pictures! It would be nice, though, to have some sort of
indication on the picture whether Magma is red or blue...
For example, you could put "Magma" next to the 4 on the right-hand
scale, and "Sage" next to the -4 -- or vice-ve
> I should point out that the strategy for multiplication in Tom and
> Robert's paper http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1413 is likely to be better.
> Judging from the timings in that paper we are about a factor of two
> behind them. I plan to implement/port their very cool trick for finite
> extension fie
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> Anyway ... question: Do we want my new code in Sage?
I assume nobody has replied because it's such an obvious yes!
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.rlmiller.org/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-de
