Re: [sage-devel] Re: Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

It's still here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/32024 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

Just wanted to mention that I posted about something similar a few years ago here: https://groups.google.com/g/sage-support/c/j1Y9yuu-VuE/m/cA7N8iqCCAAJ. At the time a trac ticket was opened, but I'm not sure about the status especially post the github migration. On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:55 AM

[sage-devel] Re: Jupyter Lab Sage menu

It would also be a good idea to open the javascript console and see if there are errors being reported around the time when the menu disappears. - Marc On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 8:20:00 PM UTC-6 Marc Culler wrote: > Viviane, > > If you do a shift-reload (or whatever makes your browser

[sage-devel] Re: Jupyter Lab Sage menu

Viviane, If you do a shift-reload (or whatever makes your browser clear its cache) does that make the menu come back? - Marc On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 8:11:45 AM UTC-6 Viviane Pons wrote: > Dear all, > > I am working on a conda distribution of sage with jupyter lab. My conda >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Proposal] allow standard packages to be pip packages, reduce source tarball size

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 1:57 AM Nathan Dunfield wrote: > On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 3:08:54 PM UTC-6 John H Palmieri wrote, > responding to Dima: > > You said: "The difference between wheel packages vs pip packages is that > the latter don't require pre-fetched wheels, and absence of the

[sage-devel] Re: Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

On Wednesday 6 March 2024 at 04:52:16 UTC-8 Giacomo Pope wrote: I think aside from maybe needing additional methods on the hyperelliptic curve, once the projective model is right and points on the curve are well defined for all cases. I do not have any intuition on whether the balanced model

Re: [sage-devel] Jupyter Lab Sage menu

Recent versions (10.3.*) of Sage have jupyterlab included, so it's a bit hard to tell what exactly is going on without seeing versions, etc. Conda seems to provide sage 10.2. It could be that installation of jupyterlab on top of sage breaks something in the environment. Using 10.3.rc2 might be a

Re: [sage-devel] Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

Thanks John. >From my minimal local testing I have at least that - random sampling on the jacobian can find every point on the jacobian (there is a fast method using sums of J(P) for P on the curve, but this doesnt guarantee all elements of the jacobian are found) - that multiplication by any

Re: [sage-devel] Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

I'm going to forward this to sage-nt as there may be people who read that but not this. Meanwhile I would recommend getting something to work correctly before worrying too much about what is most efficient. John On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, 12:52 Giacomo Pope, wrote: > *=== Summary* > > Arithmetic of

Re: [sage-devel] sensational bug!

This was also something I saw in: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37455 and I haven't been able to locally reproduce it either. On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 12:18:51 PM UTC dmo...@deductivepress.ca wrote: > I think this is issue >

[sage-devel] Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

*=== Summary* Arithmetic of divisors for Jacobians of hyperelliptic curves with two points at infinity is not currently properly supported for SageMath. Worse, there are no checks or error handling and the output of the arithmetic is simply wrong. Minimal example: sage: R. =

Re: [sage-devel] sensational bug!

I think this is issue #35715 on the sagemath github. So I think the discussion should go there. On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 6:53:04 AM UTC-5 Martin R wrote: > It is not my machine, just the bot,

Re: [sage-devel] sensational bug!

It is not my machine, just the bot, see the link above. On Wednesday 6 March 2024 at 12:42:19 UTC+1 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Not confirmed here, either. We need more details about the machine, the > OS, the setup, etc. > > Is it reproducible, i.e. if you repeat this command, does it fail again?

Re: [sage-devel] sensational bug!

Not confirmed here, either. We need more details about the machine, the OS, the setup, etc. Is it reproducible, i.e. if you repeat this command, does it fail again? Dima On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:47 AM 'Martin R' via sage-devel < sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: > On >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sensational bug!

I can't reproduce it either: on a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6900K CPU machine with 64Gb of RAM running gentoo and sage 10.3.beta0 S. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[sage-devel] Re: sensational bug!

Indeed, interesting. but *not confirmed* on my machine (Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4690 on Linux ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS) Frédéric Le mercredi 6 mars 2024 à 10:47:36 UTC+1, Martin R a écrit : > On > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/8168335359/job/22330264302?pr=37545 > > I see > > sage -t

[sage-devel] sensational bug!

On https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/8168335359/job/22330264302?pr=37545 I see sage -t --long --random-seed=286735480429121101562228604801325644303 src/sage/rings/tests.py ** Error: Failed example:: Got: Random