Re: [sage-devel] sensational bug!

This was also something I saw in: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37455 and I haven't been able to locally reproduce it either. On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 12:18:51 PM UTC dmo...@deductivepress.ca wrote: > I think this is issue >

Re: [sage-devel] sensational bug!

I think this is issue #35715 on the sagemath github. So I think the discussion should go there. On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 6:53:04 AM UTC-5 Martin R wrote: > It is not my machine, just the bot,

Re: [sage-devel] sensational bug!

It is not my machine, just the bot, see the link above. On Wednesday 6 March 2024 at 12:42:19 UTC+1 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Not confirmed here, either. We need more details about the machine, the > OS, the setup, etc. > > Is it reproducible, i.e. if you repeat this command, does it fail again?

Re: [sage-devel] sensational bug!

Not confirmed here, either. We need more details about the machine, the OS, the setup, etc. Is it reproducible, i.e. if you repeat this command, does it fail again? Dima On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:47 AM 'Martin R' via sage-devel < sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: > On >

[sage-devel] sensational bug!

On https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/8168335359/job/22330264302?pr=37545 I see sage -t --long --random-seed=286735480429121101562228604801325644303 src/sage/rings/tests.py ** Error: Failed example:: Got: Random