[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread Volker Braun
Yes. Patches to the documentation are welcome ;-) On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 8:53:23 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > Yes, use https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg >> > Okay. Should we use this rather than `sage -bdist`? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread kcrisman
> Yes, use https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg > > On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:08:13 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: >> >> Can users still contribute binaries under this new packaging? Especially >> for other Linuces and older Mac OS that would be something we want to >> encourage. >> >>

Re: [sage-release] Sage-6.10.rc1 released

2015-12-15 Thread kcrisman
Two optional tests fails (perhaps this is already known): $ ./sage --version SageMath Version 6.10.rc1, Release Date: 2015-12-13 sage -t src/sage/groups/generic.py ** File "src/sage/groups/generic.py", line 1388, in

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Hi, I've tried sage-6.10.rc1-Ubuntu_14.04-x86_64.tar.bz2 on a x86-64 laptop with Ubuntu 14.04. I've noticed some issues: 1/ The patching at first run took ages (12 min on Intel Core i5-2410 M with 4 GB RAM) (maybe one should warn the user about this, since he might expect a binary to run

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Hi, Le mardi 15 décembre 2015 10:41:49 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > > > 2/ The Jupyter notebook opened with ./sage -n jupyter starts with an > error message > > Failed to retrieve MathJax from '/nbextensions/mathjax/MathJax.js' > > Math/LaTeX rendering will be disabled. > The source of

Re: [sage-release] Sage-6.10.rc1 released

2015-12-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
this was a result of b2094a8a (Jeroen Demeyer 2015-11-18 15:53:34 +0100 1402) which did change description = G._gap_().StructureDescription().__str__() to description = str(G._gap_().StructureDescription()) but these calls are not 100% the same: sage:

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
The cause of the 3D graphics issue is similar: in the binary version, the symlink SAGE_ROOT/local/share/jupyter/nbextensions/jsmol points wrongly to a remnant of the buildbot: /mnt/highperf/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidma/local/share/jsmol

[sage-release] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread Thierry
Hi, On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:35:12PM -0800, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: [...] > The source of the problem may be a wrong symlink in the binary version: > > cd SageMath > ls -l local/share/jupyter/nbextensions/mathjax > lrwxrwxrwx 1 eric eric 120 déc. 14 03:28 >

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread kcrisman
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:20:17 PM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote: > > Yes. Patches to the documentation are welcome ;-) > > > In this case, nice try - I haven't even used binary-pkg yet! If and when I may try. > On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 8:53:23 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: >> >>

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:43:54 -0800 (PST), Volker Braun: > Here is a final test for the binaries, using the new > binary packaging. That is, now binaries are patched > automatically on first run, no more relocation after that. Thank you for that. On a MacBook Air running OS X 10.10.5, I downloaded