Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.4.beta0 released

2016-08-20 Thread Francois Bissey
> On 18/08/2016, at 14:51, François Bissey > wrote: > > On 18/08/16 02:36, leif wrote: >> Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >>> On a POWER7 machine I get an error while building the docs I get a >>> ZeroDivisionError in the plotting section. >>> Did anybody experience it? Do we have a ticket for that? >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta1 released

2016-08-20 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le vendredi 19 août 2016 23:00:10 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit : > > Hi Eric, > > I guess it comes from #19213 (that assumes that pip is installed). > Thank you Vincent! I've installed the Ubuntu package python-pip and run make again: the build was successfull. I've got some message though: [sage

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.3 released

2016-08-20 Thread leif
Volker Braun wrote: > Some of the 32-bit buildbots (including 14.04) failed to build a binary > because they segfault when building docs; This does not happen for > normal builds. Haven't had time to investigate. > > http://build.sagedev.org/release/builders/Zpkg%20%20slow%20AIMS%20bu14_32s02%20%

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.3 released

2016-08-20 Thread leif
leif wrote: > Volker Braun wrote: >> binaries are now on the way to the mirrors... > > Is a Sage 7.3 OVA also in preparation (or even already on the way)? Orthogonal to that, would including all or most of the upstream tarballs of optional (and probably also experimental) packages significantly b

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.3 released

2016-08-20 Thread Harald Schilly
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 4:40 PM, leif wrote: > Is there demand for sage-7.3-Ubuntu_{14.04,15.10,16.04}-i686.tar.bz2? > (After all, Ubuntu stopped "recommending" their 32-bit OS versions even > on 64-bit machines.) > So, the only thing I can offer are javascript events when you click on a downloa

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.3 released

2016-08-20 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On 20 August 2016 at 19:36, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 4:40 PM, leif wrote: > > Is there demand for sage-7.3-Ubuntu_{14.04,15.10,16.04}-i686.tar.bz2? > > (After all, Ubuntu stopped "recommending" their 32-bit OS versions even > > on 64-bit machines.) > > > > > So, the on

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.3 released

2016-08-20 Thread leif
Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > On 20 August 2016 at 19:36, Harald Schilly > wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 4:40 PM, leif > wrote: > > Is there demand for sage-7.3-Ubuntu_{14.04,15.10,16.04}-i686.tar.bz2? > > (Afte

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.4.beta1 released

2016-08-20 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 17/08/16 17:28, Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 7b1b3ec Updated SageMath version to 7.4.beta1 Several doctest failures

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.3 released

2016-08-20 Thread leif
leif wrote: > *** BIG SNIP -- belongs more to another branch of this thread *** > > Is Sage built from source on 32-bit Ubuntu > 12.04 (where Sage's GCC > does *not* by default get installed and used) at all functional? (Or, > will it pass [p]testlong?) > > In contrast to Sage's vanilla FSF GCC