Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 9:22:06 AM UTC+1, François Bissey wrote: > > It is probably an oversight or a corner case in > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20382 >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On 2018-05-11 10:41, Dima Pasechnik wrote: I really don't get how #20382 was ever positively reviewed. I guess we were mostly focusing on the technical aspects of the Feature check framework and not so much on the individual checks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64 Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM, from a fresh git clone + pull develop, parallel (-j16) build OK and make ptestlong passed except for 2 transient errors to due to "Jmol failed to create file", as usual on this computer (race error?). Both doctests are passed when run standalone.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:15:33 AM UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > sage -t --long src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # Timed out > I'm also seeing this randomly, somebody please investigate! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

[sage-release] Re: Release process

> > > What would be nice if there were a patchbot that does pdf doc builds, > these tend to be broken quite often. > > There is since long a plugin for that (but not activated by default). It seems that nobody has ever turned it on. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to