On Saturday, June 1, 2019 at 6:39:39 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
>
> Then how about distributing it with big warnings.
>
> There is Python 3 impatience in part of Sage's user base.
> Distributing an experimental Python 3 version would send
> a good signal.
>
> We could call the binaries
Le samedi 1 juin 2019 15:39:39 UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre a écrit :
>
>
> Then how about distributing it with big warnings.
>
> There is Python 3 impatience in part of Sage's user base.
> Distributing an experimental Python 3 version would send
> a good signal.
>
> We could call the binaries
Sat 2019-06-01 06:29:44 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 7:25 AM Frédéric Chapoton:
> >
> > Do we plan to distribute also a python3-version of
> > sage 8.8 (binaries) ? Of course, some tests are still
> > not passing, but sage works nevertheless.
>
> IMHO it is too early.
> Some
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 7:25 AM Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>
> Do we plan to distribute also a python3-version of sage 8.8 (binaries) ? Of
> course, some tests are still not passing, but sage works nevertheless.
IMHO it is too early.
Some parts of python3 version produce patently incorrect
Do we plan to distribute also a python3-version of sage 8.8 (binaries) ? Of
course, some tests are still not passing, but sage works nevertheless.
Frédéric
Le vendredi 31 mai 2019 00:59:04 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
>
