Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, December 2, 2019 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Monday, December 2, 2019 at 3:12:12 AM UTC-8, E. Madison Bray wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:50 AM John H Palmieri >> wrote: >> > >> > Broken with a Python 2 build. Do we care? >> > >> > In particular,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread David Coudert
You may check whether ticket 28818 fixes the failures for src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py > Le 2 déc. 2019 à 19:01, Emmanuel Charpentier > a écrit : > > On a slightly larger machine (Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, > slightly different packages), ptestalllong gets 9

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-12-02 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Followup (IMHO demonstrative) in this post related to 9.0.beta8. HTH, Le dimanche 1 décembre 2019 13:39:15 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 1:36 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > > wrote: > > > > > >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
On a slightly larger machine (Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, slightly different packages), ptestalllong gets 9 transient and 3 permanent failures: Running doctests with ID 2019-12-02-17-03-31-cf10a30c. Git branch: develop Using --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,external,fricas,g

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, December 2, 2019 at 3:12:12 AM UTC-8, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:50 AM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > Broken with a Python 2 build. Do we care? > > > > In particular, SageNB is not built with Python 2, but the doctester > thinks it should be: > > We do

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.0.beta7: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from t

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
On Debian testing running on Core i5 + 8 GB RAM, (after removal of gap_packages, problematic on this machine, see reports on 9.0.beta7), ptestalllong gets me the usual suspects:10 transient issues (i. e. all tests pass when ran standalone), and no permanent issue : Running doctests with ID 2019

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Dear Madison, Does this ticket address a Windows-specific issue, or does testiong it is meaningful under Linux/Mac Os ? Le lundi 2 décembre 2019 12:11:33 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > > Can I please get a review on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28258 ? > > This issue has been holding me

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:50 AM John H Palmieri wrote: > > Broken with a Python 2 build. Do we care? > > In particular, SageNB is not built with Python 2, but the doctester thinks it > should be: We do care: Support for Python 2 is not being dropped yet. Please open a blocker ticket. > ./sage -

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread E. Madison Bray
Can I please get a review on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28258 ? This issue has been holding me up for weeks, making testing difficult. On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:15 AM Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Runing tests with few optional and external packages, I get: Using --optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,dot2tex,e_antic,external,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,normaliz,notedown,openssl,pandoc_attributes,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sagenb --

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
the easiest might be to build pythonX if --with-python=X is specified. On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:42 AM François Bissey wrote: > > Yes. sagenb is no a real optional package even with python2. We overlooked > the test suite when we made some test depending on it just “# py2”. > That was in https://t

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta8 released

2019-12-02 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
I think we should maintain Python2 compatibility at least for this version. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups