Testing many optional and external packages, I get
Using
--optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,
memlimit,normaliz,notedown,openssl,pandoc_attributes,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sage_numerical_backends_coin,
sage_numerical_bac
The deprecation warning is the tested output in polyhedron/base.py line
9278.
affine_hull was deprecated in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29326.
I don't see why this test shouldn't pass as it uses the same syntax as
other deprecation tests (e.g. in src/sage/matrix/matrix.pyx line 8).
If it r
On Monday, May 11, 2020 at 12:10:41 PM UTC+2, Jonathan Kliem wrote:
>
> The deprecation warning is the tested output in polyhedron/base.py line
> 9278.
>
> affine_hull was deprecated in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29326.
>
> I don't see why this test shouldn't pass as it uses the same synta
> On May 9, 2020, at 03:22 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> Now would be a good time for you to test ;-)
Built
Thanks!
El domingo, 10 de mayo de 2020, 21:35:45 (UTC+2), Dima Pasechnik escribió:
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:10 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, May 10, 2020 at 12:06:18 PM UTC-7, Enrique Artal wrote:
> >>
> >> Two of the failed packages, palp and sympow exist in Fedora 32. D
On Sunday, May 10, 2020 at 3:40:28 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> On Sunday, May 10, 2020 at 12:44:01 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think the best course of action to support Fedora 32 in Sage 9.1 would
>> be to try to fix the gcc build.
>>
>> But I'm not sure if we want to hold
