[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Steven Trogdon
I've seen the following failures when doctesting Sage-on-Gentoo but I'm now seeing them when doctesting vanilla Sage: sage -t --long --warn-long 165.2 --random-seed=0 src/sage/rings/integer.pyx ** File

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta8 released

2020-08-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 at 3:04:18 PM UTC+1 erik@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, August 14, 2020 at 1:44:38 PM UTC+2 david@gmail.com wrote: > >> Same here on a fresh clone with macOS 10.15.16 >> >> >> [dochtml] Building en/constructions. >> [dochtml] >> [dochtml] [construct]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
> On Aug 18, 2020, at 16:01, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from fresh clones of the 9.2.b8 branch, on two

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
segfaults and aborts you get from tests are kind of worrying. Could it be that you have "rogue" libraries in /usr/local, which get picked up instead of system ones? Perhaps, post the main config.log On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, 16:01 Maxime Bombar, wrote: > On 8/20/20 4:24 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Maxime Bombar
On 8/20/20 4:24 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > It would be good to know which of these still fail if you run them > separately. I have exactly the same result by running them separately. I tried running those tests with sage9.1, and both `src/sage/rings/real_arb.pyx` and

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
It would be good to know which of these still fail if you run them separately. On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, 15:19 Maxime Bombar, wrote: > On 8/20/20 11:58 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:57 PM Maxime Bombar > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On a fresh install from sources on Debian

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Maxime Bombar
On 8/20/20 11:58 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:57 PM Maxime Bombar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation >> are ok, but tests sometimes fail : >> >> make: *** [Makefile:190: ptestlong] Error 17 > More details please -

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:57 PM Maxime Bombar wrote: > > Hi, > > On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation > are ok, but tests sometimes fail : > > make: *** [Makefile:190: ptestlong] Error 17 More details please - which tests have failed? (normally there should be a

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Kenji Iohara
It is a fresh build. > 2020/08/20 9:33、David Coudert のメール: > > was it incremental build (and from which beta) or fresh build ? > > >> Le 20 août 2020 à 02:55, Kenji Iohara > > a écrit : >> >> I have Mac OS X.15.6. I could compile it with no problem, >> but

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread David Coudert
was it incremental build (and from which beta) or fresh build ? > Le 20 août 2020 à 02:55, Kenji Iohara a écrit : > > I have Mac OS X.15.6. I could compile it with no problem, > but I had some errors running ptestlong > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the