Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Kwankyu Lee
With this release, the command sage -docbuild all pdf stops with the failure below. How about others? Building it/a_tour_of_sage. [a_tour_of] building [latex]: all documents [a_tour_of] Merging environment/index files... [a_tour_of] ... done (0 todos, 1 index, 0 citations, 0 modules) ...

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Volker Braun
On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 11:46:37 PM UTC+2 matthia...@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks, Volker, for preparing the new beta. When you have a moment, could > you react to the discussion regarding the 9.4 release cycle over in > sage-devel? > Sounds good to me! Shorter release cycles are always

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 3:21:35 PM UTC-7 jus...@mac.com wrote: > > > On May 27, 2021, at 13:53, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > This was introduced in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31103 > > should PyTest have been downloaded/installed when I installed 9.4-b0? I > see references to it, when

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
Thanks, Matthias, > On May 27, 2021, at 13:53, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 12:11:11 PM UTC-7 jus...@mac.com wrote: > > > On May 26, 2021, at 14:13, Volker Braun wrote: > > > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > > branch.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 2:13:19 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 6aa4ecee16 (tag: 9.4.beta0,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 12:11:11 PM UTC-7 jus...@mac.com wrote: > > > On May 26, 2021, at 14:13, Volker Braun wrote: > > > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Volker Braun
The "sage.libs.gap.util.GAPError: Error, OnSets: must be a set (not a immutable non-strictly-sorted plain list of cyclotomics)" is a known random failure, its pretty easy to repro by running the test in a loop. I made https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31848 for it. On Thursday, May 27, 2021

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
> On May 26, 2021, at 14:13, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from a fresh clone of the develop tree on macOS

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 5:55:39 AM UTC-7 Sébastien Labbé wrote: > I have python3.6 and python3.8 installed on my system: > [...] > My python3.8 has the above librairies available. But, it seems that my > python3.8 is not picked up by the configure script: > > See

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, 27 May 2021, 15:34 Clemens Heuberger, wrote: > Also on Ubuntu 18.04 (without any optional packages apart ccache > installed), I > have the failing doctest with graph.py (two out of three runs) and > consistently > > $ ./sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/package.py > Running

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Also on Ubuntu 18.04 (without any optional packages apart ccache installed), I have the failing doctest with graph.py (two out of three runs) and consistently $ ./sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/package.py Running doctests with ID 2021-05-27-16-31-10-59754af4. Using

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> Probably the "period" / "full stop" at the very end. > > > ... 292, ...] > > ... 292, ...]. > Goodeye, goodeye! Needs review at: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31865 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31866 Also the random failure with graph.py was noticed by Volker already:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2021-05-27 12:44 UTC, Sébastien Labbé: > > On Ubuntu 18.04, testing with various optional > and external packages, I obtain: > > The other failures are copied below (I am not able > to see the problem with the first one): Probably the "period" / "full stop" at the very end. > ... 292, ...] >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Sébastien Labbé
I have python3.6 and python3.8 installed on my system: $ python3 Python 3.6.9 (default, Jan 26 2021, 15:33:00) [GCC 8.4.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> $ python3.8 Python 3.8.0 (default, Feb 25 2021, 22:10:10) [GCC 8.4.0] on linux Type

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04, testing with various optional and external packages, I obtain: -- sage -t --long --warn-long 77.6 --random-seed=0 src/sage/databases/oeis.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t --long --warn-long 77.6 --random-seed=0

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Thank you for the release. I observe that #21295 was merged twice: 12831dd5b0 Trac #21295: recognizable series (a base for k-regular sequences) 7f610a53c0 Trac #21295: recognizable series (a base for k-regular sequences) It is the first time that I see such a thing. Sébastien On Wednesday, May