Thank you so much! sage-release ist ein Fels in der Brandung :-)
On Wednesday 14 February 2024 at 00:40:34 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
>
Thank you so much!
(reason is a FPSAC 23 software demo, which contains a link to the doc)
Best wishes,
Martin
On Sunday, 4 June 2023 at 12:47:45 UTC+2 harald@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 9:35 AM 'axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release <
> sage-r...@googlegroups.c
Would it be possible to update the documentation on sagemath.org? It seems
that it is still 9.8.
On Monday, 22 May 2023 at 15:24:44 UTC+2 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
> Wups ! Incorrect link to the Jupyter kernel problem. See rather here
>
I'd like to send a big THANK YOU!
On Monday, 13 March 2023 at 01:26:46 UTC+1 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
>
I realize that it is a big ask, but would it be possible to merge
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35060 soon (most importantly, within
sage 10.0)? It adds a single module, and I'd like to be able to present
its functionality saying that it is "in sage".
Related: should I click on the
I tried to comment out all the changes in all_cmdline.py, but this didn't
help. The diff of src/sage/interfaces/all.py is a bit unclear to me, I
don't see what could be a problem there.
On Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 17:47:29 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
> This was one of my guesses because
I just spent some time to debug this, but I failed. The problem seems to
be that sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete in
https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/80fbb4ee9ed8507d22214ed7a4ffd135c9e8c7c8/sage-shell-mode.el#L889
does not return. There is only one python file
Indeed, that was a great suggestion: 9.8.beta6 works - and it seems that
#16522 was already in 9.8.beta6. However 9.8.beta6 + #34547 fails.
Not sure where to go from here. Should I open a ticket on trac?
For me personally, this is a blocker, but I have no idea how many emacs
users there are.
Thank you for this suggestion! I will try with 9.8.beta6 + #33842. I hope
that all dependencies are in the branch.
Martin
On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 21:32:10 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote:
> Could it be #34547, #16522, or #33842? I'm just taking guesses based on
> the newly merged tickets.
Emacs stopped working for me again! I don't get it.
This is terrible.
On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 14:41:04 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
> This patches fix my Fricas issue indeed. But losing the Emacs interface is
> a big hit for me, so I revert to 9.6.beta6 for now.
>
> Thank you
M-x toggle-debug-on-quit
(and then hit C-g often enough)
I have two directories with git clones of sage. When I discovered the
problem, I went back to 9.8.beta5 in the first, and then made 9.8.beta7 in
the other. I then tried sage-shell-mode in the other, and it worked. I
then made
I'm sorry, recompiling sage fixed the emacs problem. I have no idea what
happened.
On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 12:30:23 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
> Here is the backtrace:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
> accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
>
Here is the backtrace:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
accept-process-output(nil 0 1)
sage-shell:wait-for-redirection-to-complete()
sage-shell:run-cell-raw-output("_emacs_sage_shell.print_sage_root()"
:sync t :process-buffer nil :output-buffer nil :to-string t :raw nil)
All of a sudden, emacs sage-shell-mode seems not to work any more? The
last message I get is
Checking IPython version... Done. To disable this checking, set
‘sage-shell:check-ipython-version-on-startup’ to ‘nil’.
error in process filter: Quit [2 times]
The last beta worked.
Anyone else
a fix for the findstat issue is now ready at
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34841
On Monday, 12 December 2022 at 13:41:12 UTC+1 Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> On Ubuntu 18.04 + optional packages, I get:
>
> Using --optional=build,debian,dot2tex,external,glucose,pip,sage,sage_spkg
>
> Features to be
Ready for review.
On Wednesday, 9 November 2022 at 11:36:51 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
> The findstat errors are now tracked in
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34734
>
> On Tuesday, 8 November 2022 at 16:25:58 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> The findstat errors very likely occur
The findstat errors are now tracked in
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34734
On Tuesday, 8 November 2022 at 16:25:58 UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
> The findstat errors very likely occur because findstat switched to python3
> last weekend. Some of these might be upstream errors, many thanks
The findstat errors very likely occur because findstat switched to python3
last weekend. Some of these might be upstream errors, many thanks for the
report!
Are you going to open a ticket, or should I do it?
Martin
On Monday, 7 November 2022 at 13:52:05 UTC+1 Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> On
neither worked for me. I'm trying distclean now.
On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 10:52:37 UTC+2 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 9:15 AM 'tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release
> wrote:
> >
> > I am not able to do an incremental build. Do we really need to do a
> "make distclean"
The findstat fixes (all trivial) are ready at
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33190.
On Saturday, 15 January 2022 at 08:09:30 UTC+1 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> 2022-01-14 21:49 UTC, Sébastien Labbé:
> >
> > The failures with the following files are new and are copied below:
> >
> >
The findstat failure is, unfortunately, an upstream problem, which I cannot
fix myself. Currently, the depth parameter is ignored in map queries. I
notified the person that is hopefully able to fix it.
On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 at 11:38:41 UTC+1 Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> On Ubuntu 20.04,
fixes for the fricas and findstat failures (fff) are now available on
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32886 and
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32694, in need of (very easy) review.
On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 15:54:10 UTC+1 Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> On Ubuntu 18.04 with few optional and
Is 9.1.beta1 a typo? (Should it be 9.5.beta1?)
emanuel.c...@gmail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um
19:50:00 UTC+2:
> One more data point : ptestlong running on the “naked” 9.1.beta1 + Fricas
> gives the single limit failure.
>
> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:22:26 UTC+2,
possibly https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31849 is the culprit for the
limit/FriCAS failure
axio...@yahoo.de schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um 17:19:29
UTC+2:
> Do you have easy access to previous sage releases? I don't see a reason
> why this test would have passed...
>
> Martin
>
Do you have easy access to previous sage releases? I don't see a reason why
this test would have passed...
Martin
emanuel.c...@gmail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um
16:22:26 UTC+2:
> Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity`
> failure in
I am getting an unexpected failure when running the patchbot, but it seems
not to be reproducible.
sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/doctest/control.py
**
File "src/sage/doctest/control.py", line 742, in
I'm very sorry, it seems that the problem was elsewhere. Rebuilding solved
the issue.
axio...@yahoo.de schrieb am Freitag, 9. April 2021 um 12:54:55 UTC+2:
> Indeed, SageMath version 9.3.rc1, Release Date: 2021-03-29 works just
> fine.
>
>
>
> axio...@yahoo.de schrieb am Freitag, 9. April
Indeed, SageMath version 9.3.rc1, Release Date: 2021-03-29 works just fine.
axio...@yahoo.de schrieb am Freitag, 9. April 2021 um 12:38:55 UTC+2:
> Unfortunately, one of the recent changes breaks the emacs interface
> sage-shell-mode, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31630.
>
> I think I
Unfortunately, one of the recent changes breaks the emacs interface
sage-shell-mode, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31630.
I think I recall that some display change was announced, I'll try to find
out when it happened.
Martin
Volker Braun schrieb am Mittwoch, 7. April 2021 um 00:33:00
On Ubuntu 20.04 I get
[openssl-1.1.1h] sage_bootstrap.tarball.FileNotMirroredError: tarball does
not exist on mirror network
[openssl-1.1.1h]
[openssl-1.1.1h]
the findstat issue is fixed and has positive review, see
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30630
Sébastien Labbé schrieb am Sonntag, 1. November 2020 um 20:49:26 UTC+1:
> On Ubuntu 18.04 with python3.8.0 installed, testing few optional and
> external packages, I obtain:
>
> Using
>
The findstat issue is already ready for review at
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30630.
matthia...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2020 um 20:22:26 UTC+2:
> Thanks for catching this. I have opened
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30740 for this.
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 7,
32 matches
Mail list logo
