[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta2 released

On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 6:16:00 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > a6e696e91d (tag: 9.7.beta2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to > 9.7.beta2 > [...] > fa1477350a Trac #32937: Drop Python 3.7 support in Sage 9.7 > Python 3.8 language and library features can now be used in the Sage

Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing

We automatically test on debian-bookworm ("testing") on GH Actions. Here's the run for the 9.6 release tag: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/6443847112 (all good). On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:56:12 AM UTC-7 maxime...@inria.fr wrote: > On 5/16/22 23:56, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6 released

On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote: > How long until we have stuff on pypi? That’s when I will pick up the work > in sage-on-gentoo in the current framework. > It's all in place. It's pushed automatically on each release tag on GH Actions. -

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

c/cocalc-docker > > -- William > > > On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 3:33 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > > > > Yay! Thanks a lot, Volker. > > > > On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 3:27:40 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > >> > >> The "master

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

Yay! Thanks a lot, Volker. On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 3:27:40 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.6. As always, you can > get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, > the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc4 released

LGTM. Release? On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 3:14:34 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 888d18eb85 (tag: 9.6.rc4,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

Can we get a release out soon please? On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 2:47:14 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 6:25:54 PM UTC-7 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote: > On Ubuntu with a bunch of optional packages installed, I am getting the > following failures due to pynormaliz: > > Using >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 12:04:41 PM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 2:47:14 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained s

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc3 released

uname -a > Linux DESKTOP-6879BT0 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 #1 SMP Wed Mar 2 > 00:30:59 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > The following is a link to top level log file > > ls -l *.log > -rw-r--r-- 1 me me 340308 May 1 16:08 config.log > > http

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 2:47:14 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > eb1a786c04 (tag: 9.6.rc3, trac/develop)

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc3 released

If the terminal is still open, you can check by typing "echo $CPATH" On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 11:08:59 AM UTC-7 Kenji Iohara wrote: > I think so... > > 2022年5月1日(日) 20:06 Matthias Köppe : > >> config.log please; did you run ". ./.homebrew-build-env"? >&

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc3 released

config.log please; did you run ". ./.homebrew-build-env"? On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 10:51:49 AM UTC-7 Kenji Iohara wrote: > Thanks Volker for this version. > > On my Mac OS 12.3.1,IntelCore i5 with Homebrew, I could compile Sage > 9.6.rc2, but not Sage 9.6.rc3. > Here is the error what I

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc2 released

There are some undeclared dependencies - see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31403 On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:43:34 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote: > Actually, that means libcliquer is not installed as a dependency of nauty. > Those symbols are supposed to be from libcliquer. > > > On

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc2 released

top-level config.log please On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 6:56:58 AM UTC-7 David Joyner wrote: > Hi: > > On a Ubuntu 21.10 laptop, I got this: > > The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily > during this run of 'make all-start'): > * package: giac-1.6.0.47p3.p0 > > The

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta7 released

+1 on getting a release out. We have lots of improvements over 9.5 On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 12:13:42 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > Also, we should make a new release soon. So if you have anything that you > want to be in 9.6 then now is the time to wrap it up ;) > > On Saturday, April 2,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released

Also *cygwin*-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/1907624649) looks fine. On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 8:35:24 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Tests ran at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/535313 for Linux > *ubuntu* (from -trusty all the way to -jammy):

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released

Tests ran at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/535313 for Linux *ubuntu* (from -trusty all the way to -jammy): Clean - also bionic-i386: Clean *debian* (from -stretch to -sid): Clean ... except debian-bullseye-standard

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.beta3 released

On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 3:33:58 AM UTC-8 sage-goo...@lma.metelu.net wrote: > Patchbots are locked because > Please help by reviewing https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33233 "sage -t --baseline-stats-path " -- You received this message

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta2 released

I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33390 for this On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 12:52:01 PM UTC-8 Steven Trogdon wrote: > Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32789 there is > > + AC_MSG_CHECKING([that Singular's help is working]) > + AS_IF([test x`echo "help;" |

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.beta1 released

On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 1:25:50 PM UTC-8 jus...@mac.com wrote: > Built w/o problems on macOS 10.15.7 (2019 MBP, 8-core Core i9). All tests > (‘ptestlong’) passed! > > Quick! Ship it!! > +1 on starting a release candidate cycle soon -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.beta1 released

Running "make sagelib-clean" could help. On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 9:30:21 AM UTC-8 sage-goo...@lma.metelu.net wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the release. Apparently, patchbots fail to build : > https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/0/ > > Ciao, > Thierry > > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Sunday, January 30, 2022 at 7:48:26 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.5. As always, you can > get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, > the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 10:55:03 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:57:03 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> I'm actively looking at ways to improve this, and the solution will be >> [...] automatic ticket rejections >> > &

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

Thanks for the clarification. I was only referring to the 2nd of the two solutions that you brought up in your previous message. "I'm actively looking at ways to improve this, and the solution will be either social (certain authors/reviewers will automatically be at the end of the queue) or

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

I'd say replacing this with a mild-mannered script that does the said "automatic ticket rejections" would be an improvement for the project. Key ingredients: - Respect the ticket milestone. - Post the build logs when it fails. If you need help implementing this script, let me know. On Saturday,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:57:03 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > I'm actively looking at ways to improve this, and the solution will be > [...] automatic ticket rejections > Wait... are you telling us that the process that is setting tickets back from "positive review" to "needs work"

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:57:03 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > I don't think we should have two different phases; Its usually pretty > clear when we are close to the end of the release cycle (and I do announce > it on sage-devel). > Volker, your only message regarding release

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

Thanks for opening the ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33212 for this failure On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 12:21:43 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com wrote: > > Done. > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 20:46, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> The failure in src/sage/matrix/matrix_gf

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

e "src/sage/matrix/matrix_gf2e_dense.pyx", line 524, in > sage.matrix.matrix_gf2e_dense.Matrix_gf2e_dense._multiply_karatsuba > > Failed example: > > A._multiply_karatsuba(B) == A._multiply_classical(B) > > Expected: > > True > > Got: > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

-- > > Total time for all tests: 784.5 seconds > > cpu time: 5621.8 seconds > > cumulative wall time: 6022.8 seconds > > Features detected for doctesting: > dvipng,ffmpeg,graphviz,imagemagick,pandoc,pdf2svg,sage.combinat,sage.geometry

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc2 release

Thanks Marc, I have updated https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5#Sources On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 11:31:36 PM UTC-8 marc@gmail.com wrote: > I have resolved all of the issues I know of in the binary prelease of sage > 9.5 >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

After erasing it, ./configure --with-system-openblas followed > by make succeeds for 9.5.rc3 on an M1 Mac with macOS 12.1. > > Thanks again and sorry for the noise… > > Guillermo > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 03:51, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> Might be worth checking if on this

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

; I can confirm that on an M1 Mac with macOS 11.6.2 (Big Sur), after > ./configure > --with-system-openblas, make succeeds for 9.5.rc3. > > Sorry. > > Guillermo > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 02:26, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> I thought we had solved the problems on M1 alrea

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

I thought we had solved the problems on M1 already in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30592? On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 4:50:29 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com wrote: > > About building on an M1 Mac with macOS 12.1. > > 1) > After ./configure, make fails to install > > * package:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 4:05:13 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 8ea92d580a (tag: 9.5.rc3,

[sage-release] Re: just for info

https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5#Separate_virtual_environment_for_Python_packages On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 7:15:28 AM UTC-8 HG wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed a change in sage 9.5rc2, sage is already link /usr/bin/sage in > ubuntu 22.04 in a > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

hanks! I think I am on track to make this work now. > > If anyone knows what dop stands for, I am all ears. > > - Marc > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 5:35 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > >> Use "./sage -sh" and run python / the debugger from there? >> >> On

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

;>> Based on the runs on GH Actions, I have updated the summary of platform >>>>> support in https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5#Sources >>>>> >>>>> TL;DR: It's all good now on all platforms tested on GH Actions, >>>>> incl

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

d on GH Actions, >>> including Cygwin. >>> But I would urge that 9.5 still merge the positively reviews tickets >>> marked "critical"/"blocker", such as >>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29285 (which fixes the build in the >>> p

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

ge/sage-9.5.rc1/local/var/tmp/sage/build/iml-1.0.4p1.p2 > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 03:24, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> Did you use ". .homebrew-build-env" before the latest build? >> >> On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 5:30:12 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com wrote: >&

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

5.rc1/logs/pkgs/iml-1.0.4p1.p2.log > > build directory: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/var/tmp/sage/build/iml-1.0.4p1.p2 > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 03:24, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> Did you use ". .homebrew-build-env" before the latest build? >> >> On Sund

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

; $ > > then the modification for .homebrew-build-env, followed by make -k. > > And now the only remaining problem is openblas: > > * package: openblas-0.3.18 > > last build time: Jan 17 02:24 > > log file: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/logs/pkgs/op

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

Also worth checking whether "brew install openblas" installs something new (see messages at the end of the configure run) On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 2:34:48 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > There is no error in the zn_poly log file; but could you post the openblas >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

gt;> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff 10953 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/include/cddlib/cddtypes.h >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff 11307 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/include/cddlib/cddtypes_f.h >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

There is no error in the zn_poly log file; but could you post the openblas log file please? On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 2:17:38 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Thanks for testing and posting the logs. I'll dissect the logs at > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30592 > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

1 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/include/cddlib/cddmp_f.h >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff 10953 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/include/cddlib/cddtypes.h >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff 11307 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc2 release

The sqlite doctest failure is tracked at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29092 On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 1:42:06 PM UTC-8 jonatha...@googlemail.com wrote: > Thanks Volker for preparing the release. > > All tests pass on debian buster, except > > sage -t --long

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc1 released

Many of the failures shown in test.log come from runtime use of compilers via the "cython" function. This is tracked in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31348 On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 3:39:18 AM UTC-8 Kenji Iohara wrote: > After building sage 9.5.rc1, I didmake test: here is the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

.rc1/logs/pkgs/tachyon-0.98.9.p7.log > > build directory: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/var/tmp/sage/build/tachyon-0.98.9.p7 > > > [...] > > > make[1]: *** [all-start] Error 1 > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > Logs attached. > > On Sun, 16 Jan 202

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 01:23, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> config.log please >> >> On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:24:58 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Trying to build on an M1 Mac under macOS 11.6.2, I get >>> >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

; log file: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/logs/pkgs/singular-4.2.1p3.log > > build directory: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/var/tmp/sage/build/singular-4.2.1p3 > > > [...] > > > make[1]: *** [all-start] Error 1 > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > Lo

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

https://github.com/3-manifolds/Sage_macOS/blob/main/SETUP may need updating... On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 2:49:42 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Hi Marc, > Awesome! I've added it to > https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5#Binaries > Matthias > > On Saturday

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

>> presence of pyenv). >> Also *note we have absolutely no automatic testing for the Apple Silicon >> (M1) platform.* So it would be good if users/developers who have access >> to this platform test the release candidate. >> >> >> >> On Friday, January

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

this platform test the release candidate. On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:14:13 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 3da1b22c25 (HEAD -> develop, tag:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33155 for the issue "pplpy-0.8.6-cp39-cp39-macosx_11_0_x86_64.whl is not a supported wheel on this platform." I think I now understand what's happening there. On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 9:43:13 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

The python3 used in this build is /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/bin/python3 -- could you check which version this is and do you recall how you installed it? On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 4:19:41 PM UTC-8 dmo...@deductivepress.ca wrote: > I failed to build 9.5rc0 on

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 8:02:34 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to >> 9.5.rc0 >> > > Thanks, Volker, for preparing the fi

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

Yes, please open a ticket for this On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:53:00 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > 2022-01-10 04:02 UTC, Matthias Köppe on sage-release: > > > > On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> > >> 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc0 > Thanks, Volker, for preparing the first release candidate. Tests for Linux and macOS are running on

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta9 released

On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 1:48:45 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > Now that Python 3.9 is packaged for Cygwin, maybe > `build/pkgs/python3/distros/cygwin.txt` should have > `python3` instead of `python38`. I'll check if that helps > detect Cygwin's Python 3.9.9 as a usable Python. +1,

Re: [sage-release] Sage no longer installs on Debian testing after make distclean

This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33042 On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 6:11:58 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote: > No such bloody luck. From the linbox log : > > libtool: compile: g++ -std=gnu++11 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. > -fopenmp -fabi-version=6 -O2 -Wall -g

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

I have added this report to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32789 On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 4:44:56 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > On Cygwin, build failure on sagemath_doc_html-none, > apparently having something to do with Singular. > > Details: > > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:57:40 PM UTC-8 William Stein wrote: > it would be good to amend this sentence in the README: > > "Sage fully supports all major Linux distributions, recent versions of > macOS, and Windows (using Cygwin, Windows Subsystem for Linux, or > using

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

> checking for library containing openblas_get_config... no config.log please On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 3:17:37 PM UTC-8 William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 2:23 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > > > > On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:57:40 PM UTC-

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:57:40 PM UTC-8 William Stein wrote: > > So I do "brew install openblas && ./configure && make" to continue onward: > > This fundamentally fails, because the brew installed openblas doesn't > get detected by ./configure, and make results in immediately

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 12:10:18 PM UTC-8 jus...@mac.com wrote: > unlike the previous builds, this time there is no log file for the doc > build. > > Is this a change? I did not notice anything in the changeless below that > seemed relevant. Yes, it is coming from this change:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta6 released

On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 2:58:48 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 6ec717a56d (trac/develop, tag:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 10:13:14 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:00 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > >> It's really just the command "tox -e >> docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" - try it > > > Thanks. Some more details

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

It's really just the command "tox -e docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" - try it On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 8:37:54 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > What did you do exactly? For example did you install tachyon systemwide? > > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Nov

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

I just built for this architecture successfully using "tox -e docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" (on my Intel MBP). That's slightly newer than ubuntu-focal (20.04) sage -t --random-seed=0 src/sage/algebras/quatalg/quaternion_algebra_cython.pyx [10 tests, 0.17 s]

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 9:13:25 AM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > This is a quick update about building the 9.5.beta5 version of Sage on an > M1 Mac under Docker aarch64 Linux. > > A quick remark: Sage developers who want to help on this issue do not need this specific hardware. Using

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta2 released

Interesting. To help debug this, could you edit build/bin/sage-pip-install and add "-v -v" to pip_install_flags? Then the install log for this package will contain more information. (9.5.beta2 merged https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32492, so for the first time we actually look at dependency

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta1 released

I will try on two newer-ish systems (10.14.6, 10.15.7), and let you the > results. > > Justin > > > On Sep 15, 2021, at 15:33 , Matthias Köppe wrote: > > > > Are you able to update Xcode on this system? Alternatively, could you > try the OpenSSL upgrade in http

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta1 released

Are you able to update Xcode on this system? Alternatively, could you try the OpenSSL upgrade in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32499? Darwin Kronecker.local 17.7.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.7.0: Fri Oct 30 13:34:27 PDT 2020; root:xnu-4570.71.82.8~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta6 released

On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 3:02:38 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Monday, July 26, 2021 at 6:06:08 PM UTC+1 Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> >> fedora-35 fails in the bootstrapping phase with "/usr/bin/m4: m4_esyscmd >> subprocess failed: Operation not permitt

[sage-release] Re: Trouble with gfan

OK, Simon, there is only one conclusion: Your machine is haunted and you should abandon it. On Wednesday, September 1, 2021 at 2:14:57 AM UTC-7 Simon King wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On 2021-08-31, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > This all looks fine. Can you check if anything change

[sage-release] Re: Trouble with gfan

t;. > > Now, I did "sage -f gfan", which failed again. I have posted the new log > under the old url. > > Best regards, > Simon > > On 2021-08-30, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > Well, then the gfan.log that you shared cannot possibly come from the > sa

[sage-release] Re: Trouble with gfan

1 at 11:21:58 AM UTC-7 Simon King wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On 2021-08-30, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > ./configure correctly determines that it needs to use CXX='g++ > > -std=gnu++11' to work with this old compiler. > > Check if you have environment variables CC or

[sage-release] Re: Trouble with gfan

. (This is nonstandard behavior of our build system.) On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 3:04:34 PM UTC-7 Simon King wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > the two logs are at https://users.fmi.uni-jena.de/~king/logs/ > > Best regards, > Simon > > On 2021-08-29, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > Singular

[sage-release] Re: Trouble with gfan

ias, > > On 2021-08-29, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 5:44:33 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > >> is gfan partially taken from the system? > >> > >> probably. Ubuntu 16.04 has gfan version 0.5, but Sage needs 0.6.2. > >&g

Re: [sage-release] Re: Trouble with gfan

On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 5:44:33 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > is gfan partially taken from the system? > > probably. Ubuntu 16.04 has gfan version 0.5, but Sage needs 0.6.2. > A system-wide install of old gfan might get in the way. > No, that alone cannot explain it -- we test this

[sage-release] Re: Trouble with gfan

We actually test this platform (ubuntu xenial), and gfan builds correctly. See https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3392764418?check_suite_focus=true This failure must be caused by something specific to your system - such as some stuff installed into /usr/local or something like that. On

[sage-release] Sage 9.5 release planning

Python 3.10 is scheduled to be released 2021-10-04. I would suggest that we aim to make a smaller Sage 9.5 release to be ready at that time that includes Python 3.10 support (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30766). We may need to update lots of Python packages to pick up fixes to fully

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4 released

On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 8:37:49 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > Please remember to enrich the release tour > > https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4 > > with the novelties you find exciting and wish to share > In particular, now that the Sage 9.4 documentation is up

[sage-release] Re: Issue with sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2

This is https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg/issues/28 On Monday, August 23, 2021 at 6:15:51 AM UTC-7 egourg...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just noticed that when running ./sage immediately after unpacking > sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2 on a freshly installed Ubuntu 20.04.2 >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc2 released

On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 2:41:47 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 7282b2b6c6 (trac/develop, tag:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

The problem on opensuse-tumbleweed is fixed by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32368, *needs review*. On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 12:51:32 PM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Thanks, Volker, for the latest release candidate. > > We still have problems on the following

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

Thanks, Volker, for the latest release candidate. We still have problems on the following platforms: - *opensuse-tumbleweed (*https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3274952722*): *Errors building *cypari, ecm, singular* - *conda-forge*: Multiple problems, as noted earlier - *fedora-34:* (fixed

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32359 for this -- clearly a blocker for Sage 9.4 On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 5:32:26 AM UTC-7 enriqu...@gmail.com wrote: > I have the develop version installed in two computers with Fedora 34. On > one of them, the update was successful, but in

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta6 released

On Saturday, July 24, 2021 at 4:42:01 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 8bae3ff7ad (tag: 9.4.beta6,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta5 released

On Monday, July 19, 2021 at 2:01:51 PM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 4:19:46 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained s

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta5 released

On Monday, July 19, 2021 at 2:01:51 PM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 4:19:46 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained s

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta5 released

On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 4:19:46 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > I think we are in a reasonable shape

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta5 released

On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 4:19:46 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. [...] > > f5efe4883f (tag: 9.4.beta5) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.beta5 > [...] > > 912b83d3ae Trac #31577: Move SAGE_ROOT/build/pkgs/*/src to

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta5 released

Develop is still on 9.4.beta4 On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 4:19:46 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > I think we

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta2 released

Related to this is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31565 On Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 12:34:51 AM UTC-7 david@gmail.com wrote: > Thank you for this new beta. > > I have a build error on a Intel MacBook Air with macOS 10.15.7, after make > distclean, .bootstrap, source .homebrew-build-env,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3 released

On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 10:18:05 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > On a colleague's machine: [...] > - macOS 11 > - installing from SageMath 9.3 macOS 11 binary > > After downloading and extracting the binary tarball, > running Sage launches the relocation process, > then displays the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta0 released

On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 3:21:35 PM UTC-7 jus...@mac.com wrote: > > > On May 27, 2021, at 13:53, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > This was introduced in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31103 > > should PyTest have been downloaded/installed when I installed 9.4-b0? I > se

<    1   2   3   4   >