Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

I have added this report to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32789 On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 4:44:56 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > On Cygwin, build failure on sagemath_doc_html-none, > apparently having something to do with Singular. > > Details: > > > https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~leli

Re: [sage-release] Sage no longer installs on Debian testing after make distclean

This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33042 On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 6:11:58 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote: > No such bloody luck. From the linbox log : > > libtool: compile: g++ -std=gnu++11 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. > -fopenmp -fabi-version=6 -O2 -Wall -g -DNDEB

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta9 released

On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 1:48:45 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > Now that Python 3.9 is packaged for Cygwin, maybe > `build/pkgs/python3/distros/cygwin.txt` should have > `python3` instead of `python38`. I'll check if that helps > detect Cygwin's Python 3.9.9 as a usable Python. +1,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc0 > Thanks, Volker, for preparing the first release candidate. Tests for Linux and macOS are running on https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/167

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

ore. Yes, please open a ticket for this On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:53:00 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > 2022-01-10 04:02 UTC, Matthias Köppe on sage-release: > > > > On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> > >> 38323507f6 (tag

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 8:02:34 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to >> 9.5.rc0 >> > > Thanks, Volker, for preparing the fi

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

The python3 used in this build is /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/bin/python3 -- could you check which version this is and do you recall how you installed it? On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 4:19:41 PM UTC-8 dmo...@deductivepress.ca wrote: > I failed to build 9.5rc0 on MacO

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

I have tried to reproduce this environment (with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33140, this is "tox -e local-homebrew-macos-usrlocal-python3_pythonorg-python3.9"), but pplpy compiles without problem here. Could you check whether you have an environment variable such as MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGE

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33155 for the issue "pplpy-0.8.6-cp39-cp39-macosx_11_0_x86_64.whl is not a supported wheel on this platform." I think I now understand what's happening there. On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 9:43:13 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wr

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 3da1b22c25 (HEAD -> develop, tag: 9.5.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

o this platform test the release candidate. On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:14:13 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

ld in the >> presence of pyenv). >> Also *note we have absolutely no automatic testing for the Apple Silicon >> (M1) platform.* So it would be good if users/developers who have access >> to this platform test the release candidate. >> >> >> >> On Friday

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

https://github.com/3-manifolds/Sage_macOS/blob/main/SETUP may need updating... On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 2:49:42 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Hi Marc, > Awesome! I've added it to > https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5#Binaries > Matthias > > On Sat

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

8 > > log file: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/logs/pkgs/singular-4.2.1p3.log > > build directory: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/var/tmp/sage/build/singular-4.2.1p3 > > > [...] > > > make[1]: *** [all-start] Error 1 > > make: *** [all] Error 2 &g

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 01:23, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> config.log please >> >> On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:24:58 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Trying to build on an M1 Mac under macOS 11.6.2, I get >>> >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

/Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/logs/pkgs/tachyon-0.98.9.p7.log > > build directory: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/var/tmp/sage/build/tachyon-0.98.9.p7 > > > [...] > > > make[1]: *** [all-start] Error 1 > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > Logs attached. >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc1 released

Many of the failures shown in test.log come from runtime use of compilers via the "cython" function. This is tracked in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31348 On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 3:39:18 AM UTC-8 Kenji Iohara wrote: > After building sage 9.5.rc1, I didmake test: here is the result

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc2 release

The sqlite doctest failure is tracked at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29092 On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 1:42:06 PM UTC-8 jonatha...@googlemail.com wrote: > Thanks Volker for preparing the release. > > All tests pass on debian buster, except > > sage -t --long --random-seed=14616860145288

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

947 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/include/cddlib/cddmp_f.h >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff 10953 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/include/cddlib/cddtypes.h >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff 11307 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

There is no error in the zn_poly log file; but could you post the openblas log file please? On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 2:17:38 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Thanks for testing and posting the logs. I'll dissect the logs at > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30592 >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

ib/cddmp_f.h >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff 10953 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/include/cddlib/cddtypes.h >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 gms staff 11307 Jan 16 18:21 >> /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/include/cddlib/cddtypes_f.h >> >> -rw-r--r--

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

Also worth checking whether "brew install openblas" installs something new (see messages at the end of the configure run) On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 2:34:48 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > There is no error in the zn_poly log file; but could you post the openblas > log fil

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

; $ > > then the modification for .homebrew-build-env, followed by make -k. > > And now the only remaining problem is openblas: > > * package: openblas-0.3.18 > > last build time: Jan 17 02:24 > > log file: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/logs/pkgs/op

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

ge/sage-9.5.rc1/logs/pkgs/iml-1.0.4p1.p2.log > > build directory: > /Users/gms/sage/sage-9.5.rc1/local/var/tmp/sage/build/iml-1.0.4p1.p2 > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 03:24, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> Did you use ". .homebrew-build-env" before the latest build? >> >&g

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

ge/sage-9.5.rc1/local/var/tmp/sage/build/iml-1.0.4p1.p2 > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 03:24, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> Did you use ". .homebrew-build-env" before the latest build? >> >> On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 5:30:12 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com wrote: >>

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

tested on GH Actions, >>> including Cygwin. >>> But I would urge that 9.5 still merge the positively reviews tickets >>> marked "critical"/"blocker", such as >>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29285 (which fixes the build in the >>&

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

t;> Based on the runs on GH Actions, I have updated the summary of platform >>>>> support in https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5#Sources >>>>> >>>>> TL;DR: It's all good now on all platforms tested on GH Actions, >>>>> inc

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

ks! I think I am on track to make this work now. > > If anyone knows what dop stands for, I am all ears. > > - Marc > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 5:35 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > >> Use "./sage -sh" and run python / the debugger from there? >> >&g

[sage-release] Re: just for info

https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5#Separate_virtual_environment_for_Python_packages On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 7:15:28 AM UTC-8 HG wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed a change in sage 9.5rc2, sage is already link /usr/bin/sage in > ubuntu 22.04 in a > > ./sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 4:05:13 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 8ea92d580a (tag: 9.5.rc3, trac/develop)

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

I thought we had solved the problems on M1 already in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30592? On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 4:50:29 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com wrote: > > About building on an M1 Mac with macOS 12.1. > > 1) > After ./configure, make fails to install > > * package: tachy

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

an confirm that on an M1 Mac with macOS 11.6.2 (Big Sur), after > ./configure > --with-system-openblas, make succeeds for 9.5.rc3. > > Sorry. > > Guillermo > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 02:26, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> I thought we had solved the problems on M1 alrea

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

fter erasing it, ./configure --with-system-openblas followed > by make succeeds for 9.5.rc3 on an M1 Mac with macOS 12.1. > > Thanks again and sorry for the noise… > > Guillermo > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 03:51, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> Might be worth checking if on this

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc2 release

Thanks Marc, I have updated https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5#Sources On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 11:31:36 PM UTC-8 marc@gmail.com wrote: > I have resolved all of the issues I know of in the binary prelease of sage > 9.5 > https://github.com/3-manifolds/Sage_macOS/relea

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

-- > > Total time for all tests: 784.5 seconds > > cpu time: 5621.8 seconds > > cumulative wall time: 6022.8 seconds > > Features detected for doctesting: > dvipng,ffmpeg,graphviz,imagemagick,pandoc,pdf2svg,sage.combinat,sage.geometry

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

e "src/sage/matrix/matrix_gf2e_dense.pyx", line 524, in > sage.matrix.matrix_gf2e_dense.Matrix_gf2e_dense._multiply_karatsuba > > Failed example: > > A._multiply_karatsuba(B) == A._multiply_classical(B) > > Expected: > > True > > Got: > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.rc3 released

Thanks for opening the ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33212 for this failure On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 12:21:43 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com wrote: > > Done. > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 20:46, Matthias Köppe wrote: > >> The failure in src/sage/matrix/matrix_gf

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:57:03 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > I don't think we should have two different phases; Its usually pretty > clear when we are close to the end of the release cycle (and I do announce > it on sage-devel). > Volker, your only message regarding release manageme

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:57:03 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > I'm actively looking at ways to improve this, and the solution will be > [...] automatic ticket rejections > Wait... are you telling us that the process that is setting tickets back from "positive review" to "needs work" wi

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

I'd say replacing this with a mild-mannered script that does the said "automatic ticket rejections" would be an improvement for the project. Key ingredients: - Respect the ticket milestone. - Post the build logs when it fails. If you need help implementing this script, let me know. On Saturday, J

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

Thanks for the clarification. I was only referring to the 2nd of the two solutions that you brought up in your previous message. "I'm actively looking at ways to improve this, and the solution will be either social (certain authors/reviewers will automatically be at the end of the queue) or aut

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc3 released

On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 10:55:03 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:57:03 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> I'm actively looking at ways to improve this, and the solution will be >> [...] automatic ticket rejections >> > &

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

On Sunday, January 30, 2022 at 7:48:26 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.5. As always, you can > get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, > the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.beta1 released

Running "make sagelib-clean" could help. On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 9:30:21 AM UTC-8 sage-goo...@lma.metelu.net wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the release. Apparently, patchbots fail to build : > https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/0/ > > Ciao, > Thierry > > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 04:02:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.beta1 released

On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 1:25:50 PM UTC-8 jus...@mac.com wrote: > Built w/o problems on macOS 10.15.7 (2019 MBP, 8-core Core i9). All tests > (‘ptestlong’) passed! > > Quick! Ship it!! > +1 on starting a release candidate cycle soon -- You received this message because you are subs

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta2 released

I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33390 for this On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 12:52:01 PM UTC-8 Steven Trogdon wrote: > Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32789 there is > > + AC_MSG_CHECKING([that Singular's help is working]) > + AS_IF([test x`echo "help;" | Sing

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.beta3 released

On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 3:33:58 AM UTC-8 sage-goo...@lma.metelu.net wrote: > Patchbots are locked because > Please help by reviewing https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33233 "sage -t --baseline-stats-path " -- You received this message because

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released

Tests ran at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/535313 for Linux *ubuntu* (from -trusty all the way to -jammy): Clean - also bionic-i386: Clean *debian* (from -stretch to -sid): Clean ... except debian-bullseye-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/5353145196?check_suite_focus=tru

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released

Also *cygwin*-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/1907624649) looks fine. On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 8:35:24 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Tests ran at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/535313 for Linux > *ubuntu* (from -trusty all the way to -jammy):

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta7 released

+1 on getting a release out. We have lots of improvements over 9.5 On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 12:13:42 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > Also, we should make a new release soon. So if you have anything that you > want to be in 9.6 then now is the time to wrap it up ;) > > On Saturday, April 2, 2

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc2 released

top-level config.log please On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 6:56:58 AM UTC-7 David Joyner wrote: > Hi: > > On a Ubuntu 21.10 laptop, I got this: > > The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily > during this run of 'make all-start'): > * package: giac-1.6.0.47p3.p0 > > The l

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc2 released

There are some undeclared dependencies - see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31403 On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:43:34 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote: > Actually, that means libcliquer is not installed as a dependency of nauty. > Those symbols are supposed to be from libcliquer. > > > On

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc3 released

config.log please; did you run ". ./.homebrew-build-env"? On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 10:51:49 AM UTC-7 Kenji Iohara wrote: > Thanks Volker for this version. > > On my Mac OS 12.3.1,IntelCore i5 with Homebrew, I could compile Sage > 9.6.rc2, but not Sage 9.6.rc3. > Here is the error what I hav

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc3 released

If the terminal is still open, you can check by typing "echo $CPATH" On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 11:08:59 AM UTC-7 Kenji Iohara wrote: > I think so... > > 2022年5月1日(日) 20:06 Matthias Köppe : > >> config.log please; did you run ". ./.homebrew-build-env"? >&

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 2:47:14 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > eb1a786c04 (tag: 9.6.rc3, trac/develop)

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.rc3 released

> > >uname -a > Linux DESKTOP-6879BT0 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 #1 SMP Wed Mar 2 > 00:30:59 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > The following is a link to top level log file > > ls -l *.log > -rw-r--r-- 1 me me 340308 May 1 16:08 config.log

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 12:04:41 PM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 2:47:14 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained s

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 6:25:54 PM UTC-7 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote: > On Ubuntu with a bunch of optional packages installed, I am getting the > following failures due to pynormaliz: > > Using > --optional=bliss,coxeter3,database_knotinfo,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,fricas,gap_packages,kenzo,libsem

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc3 released

Can we get a release out soon please? On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 2:47:14 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc4 released

LGTM. Release? On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 3:14:34 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > 888d18eb85 (tag: 9.6.rc4,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

Yay! Thanks a lot, Volker. On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 3:27:40 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.6. As always, you can > get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, > the self-contained source tarball is at > http://w

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

.com/sagemathinc/cocalc-docker > > -- William > > > On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 3:33 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > > > > Yay! Thanks a lot, Volker. > > > > On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 3:27:40 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > >> > >> T

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6 released

On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote: > How long until we have stuff on pypi? That’s when I will pick up the work > in sage-on-gentoo in the current framework. > It's all in place. It's pushed automatically on each release tag on GH Actions. - https://pypi.org/proj

Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing

We automatically test on debian-bookworm ("testing") on GH Actions. Here's the run for the 9.6 release tag: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/6443847112 (all good). On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:56:12 AM UTC-7 maxime...@inria.fr wrote: > On 5/16/22 23:56, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > A

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta2 released

On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 6:16:00 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > a6e696e91d (tag: 9.7.beta2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to > 9.7.beta2 > [...] > fa1477350a Trac #32937: Drop Python 3.7 support in Sage 9.7 > Python 3.8 language and library features can now be used in the Sage lib

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta2 released

On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 5:56:46 AM UTC-7 egourg...@gmail.com wrote: > this is the first version of Sage that refuses to use the system Python, > which is 3.8.10. Although only Python 3.7 is officially dropped by this > version, configure says: > > checking for python3 >= 3.8.0, < 3.11.0

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta4 released

Yes, we also see this in the CI for optional packages - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/2632874850 This is fallout from upgrading setuptools in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33866 Looks like this is already fixed in upstream symengine.py. I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta5 released

On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 8:11:38 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > that's a bug in ./bootstrap then. > Yes, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34152 for a proposed fix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta5 released

Yes, you can delete the old venv. We do not uninstall other venvs that may have been built previously. On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 1:08:57 PM UTC-7 marc@gmail.com wrote: > After working around the issues with the bootstrap script and symengine_py > I have managed to build 9.7.beta5 on a

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta5 released

On Thursday, July 14, 2022 at 5:30:47 AM UTC-7 marc@gmail.com wrote: > When I did an incremental build with the venv-python3.10.3 in place, a new > venv named python3.10.5 was created. But that new venv depends on the old > 3.10.3 venv. In fact, there are at least 16 executable files in >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta5 released

On Thursday, July 14, 2022 at 5:30:47 AM UTC-7 marc@gmail.com wrote: > If I delete all of the venvs before starting an incremental build will the > build still work, and will it create a new venv that is appropriate for its > python, even if the python version has not changed? > Yes. -- Y

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta5 released

I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34181 for this. On Thursday, July 14, 2022 at 7:36:15 AM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Thursday, July 14, 2022 at 5:30:47 AM UTC-7 marc@gmail.com wrote: > >> When I did an incremental build with the venv-python3.10.3 in plac

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:13:05 AM UTC-7 david@gmail.com wrote: > With this new beta, I see that the source code and the compiled code are > mixed. > For instance > sapristi:sage dcoudert$ ll src/sage/graphs/ > total 76264 > drwxr-xr-x 123 dcoudert coati 3936 2 aoû 16:10 . > drw

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:24:39 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > there is a bit of vagueness there: > Support for system GCC older than 6.3 dropped ¶ > > > Building Sage from source now requires

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 18:33 Matthias Köppe, wrote: > >> On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:24:39 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >>> >>> there is a bit of vagueness there: >>> Support for system GCC older than 6.3 dropped

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

I've added the sentence "An alternative is to use a sufficiently recent version of clang (LLVM)." But having more details would be better. On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:46:32 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 18:33 Matthias Köppe, wrote: &

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:51:04 AM UTC-7 isu...@gmail.com wrote: > We build conda packages regularly with non-Xcode clang on macOS. > Yes, we do also test the Sage distribution build on conda-forge-macos, which uses clang. conda-forge-macos-standard succeeds, using lots of conda packages

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

#x27; > #define match Rf_match > ``` > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 1:06 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > >> On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:51:04 AM UTC-7 isu...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> We build conda packages regularly with non-Xcode clang

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34268 (Reduce R to a dummy package, upgrade rpy2 to 3.4.5) On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 11:34:22 AM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote: > Yes, our R package is wildly outdated, which is problematic given that it > is a standard package. > &g

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.rc0 released

On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 6:15:10 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > cae9ee5177a (HEAD -> develop, tag: 9.7.r

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7 released

Awesome! On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:53:04 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.7. As always, you can > get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, > the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta0 released

Thanks for the new beta! Developers should be aware of the tightened compiler requirements: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8#Configurationchanges On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:47:59 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "d

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta1 released

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 4:15:55 AM UTC-7 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote: > DeprecationWarning: implementations of Modules().TensorProducts() now > must define the method tensor_factors > See https://trac.sagemath.org/34393 for details.The ticket pointed to by > the error message

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta1 released

See https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.7#AvailabilityofSage9.7andinstallationhelp "known issues and workarounds" On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 1:03:58 PM UTC-7 Kenji Iohara wrote: > With Pari 2.15, on MacBookPro, I even couldn't recompile Sage 9.7. .. > Kenji > > 2022年9月30日

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta4 released

I think this will be fixed by the meson-python upgrade in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34658, please test On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 10:34:52 AM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote: > scipy fails to build for me (OS X 13.0.1, Intel, with various homebrew > packages, Sage built from a new tar

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta4 released

If you're testing https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34658, you'll need "./configure --enable-download-from-upstream-url". On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:36:28 PM UTC-8 Kenji Iohara wrote: > With my Mac OS 13.0.1, with Intel Core i5, and several packages with > Homebrew, I have a problem with

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta4 released

https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21003 (PySCIPopt) adds a much better MILP solver, which has the potential for replacing GLPK as our standard solver. On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 12:19:04 PM UTC-8 david@gmail.com wrote: > This is again the MILP formulation of `edge_disjoint_spanning_tr

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta4 released

Yes, Python 3.11 is not yet supported. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33842 adds support for it and is waiting for review. On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 11:07:18 PM UTC-8 Kenji Iohara wrote: > Is Python3.11 on Mac OS too new too build Sage 9.8.beta4 ? > This seems to be related to some pro

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34932 for this On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 1:51:45 AM UTC-8 François Bissey wrote: > It is indeed a known issue with nauty on debian/ubuntu. That's the first > time someone mentioned it in a while but it is definitely broken. > > On 23/01/23 21:28,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

./configure --without-system-libnauty On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 4:30:05 PM UTC-8 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote: > Would it be better to just remove nauty or is there a way to force Sage to > build and link with its own copy of nauty? > > Thanks, > Travis > > > On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 6:5

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

./configure --without-system-nauty On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 4:30:05 PM UTC-8 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote: > Would it be better to just remove nauty or is there a way to force Sage to > build and link with its own copy of nauty? > > Thanks, > Travis > > > On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 6:51:4

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta7 released

>From looking at that file: https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode/blob/master/emacs_sage_shell.py#L159 In 9.8.beta7: sage: isinstance(axiom, sage.interfaces.expect.Expect) False On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 5:15:53 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote: > I just spent some time to debug this

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 Release Tour

So far we have: 1. 1. Linear algebra 1. Submodules of tensor modules with prescribed symmetries

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 9:30:30 AM UTC-8 Sébastien Labbé wrote: ./bootstrap: 9: m4: Permission denied make: *** [Makefile:365 : configure] Erreur 1 Do you have "." in PATH? What does "which m4" say? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-r

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc1 released

Thanks for the new rc. It's currently not tagged on vbraun/sage though; could you push the tag please? On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 6:14:57 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > Note: the old trac git server is already disabled and the new > https://github.com/sagemath/sage is still locked for migra

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc1 released

I've fast-forwarded develop to 9.8.rc1 on https://github.com/sagemath/sage On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 9:21:45 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > tag is pushed! > > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 5:58:59 PM UTC+1 matthia...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Thanks for the new rc. It's currently not tagged

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 Release Tour

The link to it from https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours will have to be adjusted after the renames. On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 1:11:18 AM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > The release tour for the upcoming 9.8 release is now found at > > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/Sage-9.8-Release-To

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 Release Tour

I've added a bit on the GitHub migration to the release tour: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/Sage-9.8-Release-Tour#sage-development-has-moved-from-trac-to-github On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 1:11:18 AM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > The release tour for the upcoming 9.8 release is now found

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8 released

Neither the "dist.yml" nor the "ci-..." workflows have run on the push to the 9.8 tag on sagemath/sage. I'll investigate. On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 1:54:43 PM UTC-8 François Bissey wrote: > When will we have packages up on pypi? I now rely on these for stable > release in sage-on-gentoo

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8 released

I've created a new PyPI deployment token and made it available to our repos. I've started https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/workflows/dist.yml manually. On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 2:33:12 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 10:31 PM Matthias Kö

<    1   2   3   4   >