Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing

2022-05-17 Thread Maxime Bombar
On 5/16/22 23:56, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: After perusing the failures log and some wild guesses, problem worked around by |./configure --with-system-python=no|. Does this problem deserve reporting to Debian (/i. e./ filing a ticket against Debian|python3| package) ? I just tried on Deb

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-24 Thread Maxime Bombar
On 8/20/20 5:05 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > segfaults and aborts you get from tests are kind of worrying. Could it > be that you have "rogue" libraries in /usr/local, which get picked up > instead of system ones? > > Perhaps, post the main config.log > Hi, I upgraded to beta10, and every segfault

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Maxime Bombar
/rings/complex_arb.pyx` failed with the same error as 9.2.beta9 but the other tests passed. How can I be more helpful ? Best, -- Maxime Bombar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivin

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-20 Thread Maxime Bombar
On 8/20/20 11:58 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:57 PM Maxime Bombar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation >> are ok, but tests sometimes fail : >> >> make: *** [Makefile:190: pt

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

2020-08-19 Thread Maxime Bombar
Hi, On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation are ok, but tests sometimes fail : make: *** [Makefile:190: ptestlong] Error 17 -- MB. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group