Hi,
I've tried
sage-6.10.rc1-Ubuntu_14.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
on a x86-64 laptop with Ubuntu 14.04.
I've noticed some issues:
1/ The patching at first run took ages (12 min on Intel Core i5-2410 M
with 4 GB RAM)
(maybe one should warn the user about this, since he might expect a
binary to run
Can users still contribute binaries under this new packaging? Especially
for other Linuces and older Mac OS that would be something we want to
encourage.
Here is a final test for the binaries, using the new binary packaging. That
> is, now binaries are patched automatically on first run, no m
Yes, use https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:08:13 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Can users still contribute binaries under this new packaging? Especially
> for other Linuces and older Mac OS that would be something we want to
> encourage.
>
>
--
You recei
> Yes, use https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg
>
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:08:13 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> Can users still contribute binaries under this new packaging? Especially
>> for other Linuces and older Mac OS that would be something we want to
>> encourage.
>>
>>
O
Yes. Patches to the documentation are welcome ;-)
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 8:53:23 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Yes, use https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg
>>
> Okay. Should we use this rather than `sage -bdist`?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi,
Le mardi 15 décembre 2015 10:41:49 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
>
>
> 2/ The Jupyter notebook opened with ./sage -n jupyter starts with an
> error message
>
> Failed to retrieve MathJax from '/nbextensions/mathjax/MathJax.js'
>
> Math/LaTeX rendering will be disabled.
>
The source of t
The cause of the 3D graphics issue is similar: in the binary version, the
symlink
SAGE_ROOT/local/share/jupyter/nbextensions/jsmol
points wrongly to a remnant of the buildbot:
/mnt/highperf/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidma/local/share/jsmol
w
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:20:17 PM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Yes. Patches to the documentation are welcome ;-)
>
>
>
In this case, nice try - I haven't even used binary-pkg yet! If and when I
may try.
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 8:53:23 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>
Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:43:54 -0800 (PST), Volker Braun:
> Here is a final test for the binaries, using the new
> binary packaging. That is, now binaries are patched
> automatically on first run, no more relocation after that.
Thank you for that.
On a MacBook Air running OS X 10.10.5, I downloaded
The mathjax issue is clear, I'll fix it in the next version (change
symlinks to relative)
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 8:36:29 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> $ ./sage -n jupyter
> From there, I couldn't figure out how to navigate
> to my home folder to create a jupyter notebook.
>
I have same problem with 16.04 using binary, but I compiled it
successfully with not problem.
Le 15/12/2015 10:41, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
Hi,
I've tried
sage-6.10.rc1-Ubuntu_14.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
on a x86-64 laptop with Ubuntu 14.04.
I've noticed some issues:
1/ The patching at first run
2015-12-16 00:26:48 -0800 (PST) Volker Braun:
> The mathjax issue is clear, I'll fix it in the next version (change symlinks
> to relative)
Thank you.
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 8:36:29 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> $ ./sage -n jupyter
>> From there, I couldn't figure out
>
> Another thing I wanted to mention is the following.
>
> When I started Sage for the first time from the SageMath 6.10.rc1
> binaries for OS X, it started ouputting a bunch of lines (roughly
> 2300 of them) starting with "patching", before finally giving the
> Sage welcome header and the Sa
Hi,
Le jeudi 17 décembre 2015 18:10:43 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit :
>
>
> I'd +1 that; I haven't tested these binaries yet since I don't have El
> Capitan but I agree that is not very user-friendly.
>
Note that this issue is not specific to OS X: the long patching takes place
with Linux as well (
The patching can be done faster, but it has to work first ;-) Also I'm
pretty sure that it even now is much faster than the unpacking of the
tarball. In any case I've added a message.
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 6:51:03 PM UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Note that this issue is no
Le jeudi 17 décembre 2015 20:30:52 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> The patching can be done faster, but it has to work first ;-) Also I'm
> pretty sure that it even now is much faster than the unpacking of the
> tarball. In any case I've added a message.
>
>
>
Thanks.
I think that with a m
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 19:30:51 UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> The patching can be done faster, but it has to work first ;-) Also I'm
> pretty sure that it even now is much faster than the unpacking of the
> tarball. In any case I've added a message.
>
unless you've already sped it up, i
17 matches
Mail list logo
