I just added a comment about a 32-bit failure, if that can be fixed
relatively soon then we shouldn't have any problem getting it into 10.0!
On Friday, March 10, 2023 at 9:21:38 AM UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
> I realize that it is a big ask, but would it be possible to merge
> https://github
I realize that it is a big ask, but would it be possible to merge
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35060 soon (most importantly, within
sage 10.0)? It adds a single module, and I'd like to be able to present
its functionality saying that it is "in sage".
Related: should I click on the "u
Le mercredi 8 mars 2023 à 00:12:17 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
It looks like the graph failures have been reported at
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35157. Emanuel, are those the ones
you're seeing?
Yep !
This happens with Debian testing’s nauty, libnauty2 and libnauty2-dev,
It looks like the graph failures have been reported at
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35157. Emanuel, are those the ones
you're seeing?
On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 8:20:30 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
> The resulting 10.0.beta3 passes ptestlong witrh the two permanent
> fai
The resulting 10.0.beta3 passes ptestlong witrh the two permanent failures
already reported for the previous betas and the final release of Sage 9.
HTH,
Le dimanche 5 mars 2023 à 13:05:40 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
> On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM :
>
>-
>
On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM :
-
A first attempt to upgrade from 10.0.beta2 apparently succeeded, but
trying to run make ptestlong failed at the initial build documentation
step, even after repeated cleanup of documentation.
-
A second attempt af
Thank you for the release.
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- build (-j16) from a fresh git clone and with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"
Eric.
Le vendredi 3 mars 2023 à 01:03:32 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :
> As always, you can get t
