[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-24 Thread Volker Braun
The Maxima error is http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17667. This seems to be a serious bug in the new Maxima version. On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 at 2:50:40 AM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote: > > On Monday, January 5, 2015 2:38:41 PM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> As usual, get the "develop" bra

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-24 Thread Volker Braun
The former is now #17666 (needs review) On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 at 2:50:40 AM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote: > > sage -t --long --warn-long 38.0 src/sage/libs/singular/polynomial.pyx # 1 > doctest failed > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-r

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-22 Thread Marc Mezzarobba
Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > the build scripts of some spkgs [...] > were using the system-wide version of setuptools (namely > python-setuptools-5.5.1-1 from debian sid) rather than the version > shipped with sage. Ok, I think I found the culprit: some other Python library I had installed had put a

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-22 Thread Marc Mezzarobba
Hi, I'm having trouble building 6.4.beta5 from a clean git checkout on debian sid. Unfortunately, I no longer have the logs, but it looked like the build scripts of some spkgs, including at least jinja2, were using the system-wide version of setuptools (namely python-setuptools-5.5.1-1 from debian

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-07 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:50 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Volker Braun wrote: >> Do you have /scratch/wstein/sage-6.5.beta5/src/setup.py? I just checked and >> that is definitely in the tarball. > > > Nope -- > > /scratch/wstein/sage-6.5.beta5$ ls -lht > /scratch/wste

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-07 Thread kcrisman
> > sage -t --long --warn-long 38.0 src/sage/interfaces/maxima.py # Timed out > > I get this too, 10.7. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-r

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread Volker Braun
Its tricky to test for memory leaks... if you want to go ahead and remove these tests (or add # not tested) then that would be fine with me. Really doctests are only useful if they are reproducible. On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 12:01:56 AM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote: > > If you mean the fail

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread John H Palmieri
If you mean the failure in singular/polynomial.pyx, it looks more like a memory leak: sage -t --long src/sage/libs/singular/polynomial.pyx ** File "src/sage/libs/singular/polynomial.pyx", line 166, in sage.libs.singular.polynomi

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > Do you have /scratch/wstein/sage-6.5.beta5/src/setup.py? I just checked and > that is definitely in the tarball. Nope -- /scratch/wstein/sage-6.5.beta5$ ls -lht /scratch/wstein/sage-6.5.beta5/src/setup.py ls: cannot access /scratch/wstein/sa

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread Volker Braun
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 11:38:37 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > In that case you don't get an empty list for the "packages that failed". > I meant to say: You do get an empty list, of course. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" gro

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread Volker Braun
Is the first failure also in the maxima tty interface or elsewhere? I'we seen some OSX pty handling bugs in http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16474, so I'm not really surprised that there are random failures on Apple machines. On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 5:20:05 PM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread Volker Braun
Do you have /scratch/wstein/sage-6.5.beta5/src/setup.py? I just checked and that is definitely in the tarball. The reason why it doesn't give a useful error message is that the build system does some build steps outside of a "package", for example installing the Sage library. In that case you d

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread William Stein
Hi, I tried to build on Ubuntu 14.04 (SageMathCloud) in the same place, same account, same environment, same setup as usual, where sage-6.5.beta[1-3] all built perfectly and passed all tests. However, this time the build completely failed (with sage-6.5.beta5). It FAILS with: --- ... make[3]: `

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread John H Palmieri
I don't know if you need the whole thing, but here is the end of the snippet from ptestlong.log: sage: maxima.facts() ## line 664 ## [] sage: var('a') ## line 666 ## a sage: maxima('limit(x^a,x,0)') ## line 668 ## sage: sig_on_count() ## line 675 ## 0 sage: maxima._eval_line('1+1;') ## line 729

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-06 Thread Volker Braun
This is a timeout, right? Can you run the test with --verbose and see where it hangs? On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 2:50:40 AM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote: > > On Monday, January 5, 2015 2:38:41 PM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> As usual, get the "develop" branch or download the self-contained

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-05 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, January 5, 2015 5:50:40 PM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > On Monday, January 5, 2015 2:38:41 PM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> As usual, get the "develop" branch or download the self-contained source >> tarball from http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html >> >> On two OS X m

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2015-01-05 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, January 5, 2015 2:38:41 PM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: > > As usual, get the "develop" branch or download the self-contained source > tarball from http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > On two OS X machines, two of the same failures as in 6.4.beta3: ---

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2014-10-12 Thread Anne Schilling
> scons: `install' is up to date. > Updating Cython code > Enabling Cython debugging support > Finished Cythonizing, time: 5.34 seconds. > Discovering Python source code > Discovered Python source, time: 0.05 seconds. > Cleaning up stale installed files > - cleaning /Applications/sage

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2014-10-12 Thread François Bissey
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 15:52:36 Volker Braun wrote: > Workaround: > > mkdir -p local/share/sage/ext/valgrind > make Yes got me through, build in progress now. Francois -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2014-10-12 Thread François Bissey
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 15:14:47 Anne Schilling wrote: > Hi Volker, > > Thanks! I get the following problem though on MacOS 10.6.8 > > ... > [repl ] reading sources... [ 69%] sage/repl/display/util > [repl ] reading sources... [ 76%] sage/repl/interpreter > [dynamics ] reading sources... [ 70

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2014-10-12 Thread Volker Braun
Workaround: mkdir -p local/share/sage/ext/valgrind make -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to th

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2014-10-12 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Volker, Thanks! I get the following problem though on MacOS 10.6.8 ... [repl ] reading sources... [ 69%] sage/repl/display/util [repl ] reading sources... [ 76%] sage/repl/interpreter [dynamics ] reading sources... [ 70%] sage/dynamics/interval_exchanges/iet [polynomia] reading sources