Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-15 Thread kcrisman
If I understand correctly, this version (and perhaps some previous ones) have fixed the optional business. Not yet, wait for Sage 6.8.beta4 Gotcha. Nathann, thanks for that clarification about mirrors, I wasn't aware of that discrepancy, which makes sense. -- You received this

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-12 Thread John Cremona
On 12 June 2015 at 17:24, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: No, that version really is installed. I know that because (1) $ cat build/pkgs/database_cremona_ellcurve/package-version.txt 20150519 I was trying to convince you that this, in particular, does *not* mean that you have

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-12 Thread John Cremona
On 12 June 2015 at 14:40, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Another wrong output is database_cremona_ellcurve... 20121022 (20140829) where the version actually installed is 20150519 ! That's surprising. Could you confuse version installed with the latest version that

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-12 Thread Nathann Cohen
No, that version really is installed. I know that because (1) $ cat build/pkgs/database_cremona_ellcurve/package-version.txt 20150519 I was trying to convince you that this, in particular, does *not* mean that you have the latest version installed on your computer. and (2) when I run Sage

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-12 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-06-12 15:19, kcrisman wrote: If I understand correctly, this version (and perhaps some previous ones) have fixed the optional business. Not yet, wait for Sage 6.8.beta4 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-12 Thread kcrisman
If I understand correctly, this version (and perhaps some previous ones) have fixed the optional business. Though $ sage --optional still took a LONG time to do its thing... maybe there should be a progress indicator while it seeks out mirrors. Anyway, my question is the following. $

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-12 Thread John Cremona
Another wrong output is database_cremona_ellcurve... 20121022 (20140829) where the version actually installed is 20150519 ! John On 12 June 2015 at 14:28, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, If I understand correctly, this version (and perhaps some previous ones)

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-09 Thread Sébastien Labbé
1 - On the first compilation, I get: [algebras ] writing output... [ 96%] sage/algebras/steenrod/steenrod_algebra_mult [algebras ] writing output... [100%] sage/algebras/weyl_algebra [algebras ] dumping object inventory... done [algebras ] build succeeded. [graphs ] reading sources... [ 73%]

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-09 Thread Volker Braun
make doc-clean make doc On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 1:57:54 PM UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé wrote: 1 - On the first compilation, I get: [algebras ] writing output... [ 96%] sage/algebras/steenrod/steenrod_algebra_mult [algebras ] writing output... [100%] sage/algebras/weyl_algebra [algebras ]

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.8.beta3 released

2015-06-05 Thread strogdon
Yes, this now makes sense. I must have upgraded my system libvpx between 6.8.beta2 and 6.8.beta3. Thanks. On Thursday, June 4, 2015 at 6:03:04 PM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote: As always, you can get the latest beta version from the develop git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source