[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta0 released

2020-05-29 Thread darwin doppelganger
"make" and "make ptestlong" both succeed on my MacBook pro, Mojave 10.14.6. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta0 released

2020-05-31 Thread David Coudert
Some tickets merged in 9.2.beta0 are not marked as closed: 29639, 29645, 29652, 29656 ,29658, 29661, 29664, 29673. See for instance https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29656 or https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29660 Le jeudi 28 mai 2020 23:14:41 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > As always, you ca

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta0 released

2020-06-01 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
On Debian testing running o core i7 + 16 GB RAM, pulling Trac#28656 on top of a 9.1 rebuilt from make distclean (using all the system packages ecommended by ./config) leads to 11 failures (and 1 timeout, which doesn’t when ran standalone) : File Result

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta0 released

2020-06-03 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Testing various optional and external packages, I get Using --optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,normaliz,notedown,openssl,pandoc_attributes,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sage_numerical_ba