Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
You also were saying that you have MAXIMA set to an installation of Maxima. Note that Sage won't be able to use it. Sage uses Maxima in two ways: as a Python module embedding ECL (with Maxima installed there) and (something we work on to get rid of) interacting with Maxima built with ECL with pexp

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 12:44 PM 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release wrote: > > > I agree with you. I think the best thing for me, is just to make a brand new > Virtual box, and install a new Linux and start everything from clean system. > It will take me 2-3 days as I have to install few things

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-05 Thread 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release
I agree with you. I think the best thing for me, is just to make a brand new Virtual box, and install a new Linux and start everything from clean system. It will take me 2-3 days as I have to install few things I need, Then will try installing sagemath again after that. Thanks for the help. --

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I suspect you have an installation of openblas, or/and some other blas/lapack, in /usr/local - and this results in scipy being unable to link it correctly. (or perhaps it's not /usr/local, but some other location known to pkg-config) numpy and scipy accumulated ~20 years of layer upon layer of o

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-05 Thread 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release
Here is the output for the new command you posted >ldd local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/numpy/core/_multiarray_umath.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffd883d4000) libcblas.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcblas.so.3 (0x7f25a6532000) libopen

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 9:58 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 9:04 AM 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release > wrote: > > > > > > Here is the output > > > > >ldd > > >/home/me/TMP/sage-9.8.rc0/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/scipy/special/_ufuncs.cp

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 9:04 AM 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release wrote: > > > Here is the output > > >ldd > >/home/me/TMP/sage-9.8.rc0/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/scipy/special/_ufuncs.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffc53be9000)

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-05 Thread 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release
Here is the output >ldd /home/me/TMP/sage-9.8.rc0/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/scipy/special/_ufuncs.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffc53be9000) libgfortran.so.5 => /usr/lib/libgfortran.so.5 (0x7fc232878000) libm.so.6 =>

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
one source of trouble might be your LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/mnt/g/public_html/scripts: setting. Build systems are usually ignoring it, linking with "correct" libraries, but at runtime (e.g., while importing a Python module using libraries) this might result in picking a wrong library

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 1:51 PM 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release wrote: > > "Was it an incremental build. If so, >make distclean > and > build again from scratch." > > It was not an incremental build. I extracted the gzip file and did the steps > I showed. So I do not need to do "make dist

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023, 13:51 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release, < sage-release@googlegroups.com> wrote: > "Was it an incremental build. If so, >make distclean > and > build again from scratch." > > It was not an incremental build. I extracted the gzip file and did the > steps I showed. So I do

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-04 Thread 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release
"Was it an incremental build. If so, make distclean and build again from scratch." It was not an incremental build. I extracted the gzip file and did the steps I showed. So I do not need to do "make distclean" since everything is new. But I repeated now everything again using "make distcle

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hello, Was it an incremental build. If so, make distclean and build again from scratch. Anyhow, if you look in your istall.log you'll see problems with a number of packages, e.g. fpylll, scipy. [sagemath_doc_html-none] [manifolds] ImportError: /home/me/TMP/sage-9.8.rc0/local/var/lib/sage/venv

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-04 Thread François Bissey
There are at least two different issues that breaks the build of the doc for you: [sagemath_doc_html-none] pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'fpylll<=0.5.9,>=0.5.9' distribution was not found and is required by sagemath-standard [sagemath_doc_html-none] Warning: Could not import sage.ma

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-04 Thread 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release
I get this error on Linux virtual box running lsb_release -a LSB Version:n/a Distributor ID:ManjaroLinux Description:Manjaro Linux Release:22.0.0 Codename:Sikaris After extracting the gzip file, these are the commands I did unset SAGE_ROOT unset SAGE_LOCAL export GIAC=/u

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 7:33 AM Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 7:37:27 PM UTC+1 matthia...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 9:30:30 AM UTC-8 Sébastien Labbé wrote: > ./bootstrap: 9: m4: Permission denied > make: *** [Makefile:365 : configure] Erre

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-03 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
In Debian, there is no package `ranlib`, the `ranlib` *binary* is included in the `binutils-`, which is depended upon by the pseudo-package `binutils`. HTH, Le vendredi 3 février 2023 à 08:33:10 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : > On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 7:37:27 PM UTC+1 matthia...@gma

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 7:37:27 PM UTC+1 matthia...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 9:30:30 AM UTC-8 Sébastien Labbé wrote: ./bootstrap: 9: m4: Permission denied make: *** [Makefile:365 : configure] Erreur 1 Do you have "." in PATH? No What does "which m4" say?

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 9:30:30 AM UTC-8 Sébastien Labbé wrote: ./bootstrap: 9: m4: Permission denied make: *** [Makefile:365 : configure] Erreur 1 Do you have "." in PATH? What does "which m4" say? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-r

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023, 17:30 Sébastien Labbé, wrote: > On another machine running Ubuntu 22.04, installing sage from source from > scratch, I get "m4: Permission denied" error during the "make configure". > Should I "sudo make configure" ? > no. Something it either off with permissions in SAGE_ROOT

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 6:31:21 PM UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote: Some people have had an issue with Singular: the system version is too new. Using "./configure --with-system-singular=no" (probably after "make distclean"?) would help, if that's the problem. There is an upgrade ticket for

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread John H Palmieri
Some people have had an issue with Singular: the system version is too new. Using "./configure --with-system-singular=no" (probably after "make distclean"?) would help, if that's the problem. There is an upgrade ticket for Singular that has had many isses, but last time I checked, it had a posi

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On another machine running Ubuntu 22.04, installing sage from source from scratch, I get "m4: Permission denied" error during the "make configure". Should I "sudo make configure" ? Never done that before... See below: $ make configure ./bootstrap -d make[1] : on entre dans le répertoire « /home

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Thanks for the release. On my side, I am stuck with the following. I was having the same issue with the previous version. I saw I was not alone, but I still don't know what is the solution? Anybody know? Make distclean? Sébastien [sagelib-9.8.rc0] installing. Log file: /home/slabbe/GitBox/sa

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-02-01 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le lundi 30 janvier 2023 à 13:59:27 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for sage -t --long --warn-long 66.8 --random-seed=818

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-01-30 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
BTW : please consider including #34935 (already positively reviewed...). Le lundi 30 janvier 2023 à 18:24:38 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM : > > - upgrading 9.8.beta7 + #34935 fails ; I had to go the `make distclean ; > ... ` way. > > -

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-01-30 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM : - upgrading 9.8.beta7 + #34935 fails ; I had to go the `make distclean ; ... ` way. - `ptestlong` gives the same three permanent failures already reported for a while - reinstalling `mathics` and `pari_jupyter`fail. HTH, Le lundi 30 janvier

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-01-30 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for sage -t --long --warn-long 66.8 --random-seed=81878619703120460056743231466438357448 src/sage/env.py **

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

2023-01-29 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Please consider #34873 for this release. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on th