Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-29 Thread leif
leif wrote: > Volker Braun wrote: >> 8400a23 Updated Sage version to 6.10.beta6 > > Besides the usual doctest failure*, I'm getting new numerical noise in > beta6: > > sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx > ***

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-29 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Nov 27, 2015, at 14:23 , Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from the tarball, successfully, on two OS X systems, 10.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-28 Thread Rob Beezer
On SageMathCloud, built from source, passes long tests ("ptestlong"). Development Images and Build Logs available at: https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/53b77207-8614-4086-a032-432af4b4cdbd/files/sage-dev-images/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sag

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-28 Thread Ralf Stephan
I have seen that too with some short-lived development versions of pynac. Since this was more than a month ago I am sure there was not gcc-5 installed when it happened. Also it was several doctests simultaneously, and always a difference of one in the Graphic objects. On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 22:40 le

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-28 Thread leif
leif wrote: > leif wrote: >> Francois Bissey wrote: __ * sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx ** File "src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx", line 11021, in sage.symboli

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-28 Thread leif
leif wrote: > Francois Bissey wrote: >>> __ >>> * >>> sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx >>> ** >>> File "src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx", line 11021, in >>> sage.symbolic.expression.Expressi

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-28 Thread leif
Francois Bissey wrote: > >> On 29/11/2015, at 08:16, leif wrote: >> >> Volker Braun wrote: >>> 8400a23 Updated Sage version to 6.10.beta6 >> >> Besides the usual doctest failure*, I'm getting new numerical noise in >> beta6: >> >> sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dens

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-28 Thread Volker Braun
One buildbot slave is Haswell-E with gcc 5.1.1 and I can't reproduce it. Though it seems pretty genuine, just increase the tolerance -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-28 Thread Francois Bissey
> On 29/11/2015, at 08:16, leif wrote: > > Volker Braun wrote: >> 8400a23 Updated Sage version to 6.10.beta6 > > Besides the usual doctest failure*, I'm getting new numerical noise in > beta6: > > sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx > ***

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-28 Thread leif
Volker Braun wrote: > 8400a23 Updated Sage version to 6.10.beta6 Besides the usual doctest failure*, I'm getting new numerical noise in beta6: sage -t --long --warn-long 60.9 src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx ** File "src/s

[sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta6 released

2015-11-27 Thread Volker Braun
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 8400a23 Updated Sage version to 6.10.beta6 4090066 Trac #19626: OpenSSL hack for El Capitan e17ba67 Trac #19513: remov